Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Lets Just Get To It



Well there it is another game, another loss.  Questions and answers surround every team and with todays games arise the same questions that seem to surround our team.  What will need to do put together the right formula for winning.  I know when we came into last offseason we entered with several questions, i.e.: offensive line, salary cap, receiver depth, depth behind Jackson, a true QB, defensive line, safety questions, holes at LB, a coaching question, and if I missed any please forgive me.  The answers we came with when this seasons started with were two additoins to our offensive line, an excellent strong safety in Butler, a new coach in Spags, a committment to Bulger, a second round pick for MLB from Ohio, and several cuts (including some into the season) to create some space in the cap.  We left the questions of a true QB, can the defensive line put it together (many thought they would under Spanguola), experience wide receivers (Robinson is a fine acquisition with a history of injury in his short career), and no one behind Steven Jackson.  The current results are a 1-11 record that simply states this team has not found the formula to find victory.

Being honest and being blunt, I am not sure all the question marks left running into the season are our primary reason for our record.  Actually I would place the primary factos on two sources more than any, equally in which I speak.  The two I have identified is the extremely difficult schedule that we started with and we will finish with, and the equally attorcious play calling this year on offense.  Now there are so many other things that have gone wrong, particularly the complete vacuum that occurred at wide receive this year that has led to countless drops (I am sure someone knows the stat on this one), and the lack of experience route running necessary, but every game it is absolute triumph when we find the end zone, knowing we may not see that territory for a week (as today was a prime example).  No the schedule we saw was admonishing and one only a proven team could take opening in Seattle (a bad team who play very difficult in their own building) and then fly across country to Washington (another bad team, but better than most realize).  Only to come home to a very powerful offense in Green Bay, and the story goes on and on, but the play calling has just guaranteed loss in so many games.  From a virtual committment of other teams to stack 8 or even 9 guys in the box to stop Jackson, you would think the offensive game plan would be at least two-four times a game send a receiver deep with max protect and use the speed we do have, but we don't.  Fact is the play calling is so predictable it seems every defensive coordinator comes in with the same strategy, have our passing game beat them.

Now back to what this post was meant to state, we left las season with several questions and some are answered but heading towards the last four games here are questions we have and somethings we need to identify:

1) Our QB, Bulger who was actually respectable this year is certainly going to be released and how do we plan to address this position.  Do we look to the draft, free agency, or to Boller or Null?

2) There is no depth at RB, we are going to wear him, Jackson out before his time, and we need to do something quick to help alleviate his load.

3) The Line actually looked really good (I have watched every game this season and can't believe the improvements), but Barron leads all offensive line men in penalties (surprising holding is at 7) and is a free agent.  Do we let him go and how do we address the position?

4) Receiver Depth is actually better than we thought, thanks to the additions of Gibson (who looks very good depsite his fumble today) and Amendola (who is good for a big play every game, along with a gut wrenching drop).  This unit looks to have made significant improvement during the season, but is there a number one in the mix here?  Is Robinson a player we can actually count on to be healthy?  Where would we look for a number one?  Free agency, trade, or draft?

5) How do we fix the defensive line.  Who knows if they bring back Carriker, but for certain we need a presence that is explosive, dynamic, and capable of eating up blocks.  I certainly see Ryan making plays, but you hear his name called out maybe three, maybe four times a game.  I like what I see when Scott is in there, but is he the presence we need?  Depth and a mean man in the middle is definitely an area that has to be addressed and quick.

6) Linebacker, trading Witherspoon brought much more than the pick and the possible talented wide receiver.  It brought cap flexibility (as did the trade of Hill) and brought a big gaping whole at the weakside.  Is Vbora (forgive the spelling) the right guy, is Lenon still a big man to rack up tackles at the other side.  This year's draft has some depth at LB particularly the kid from UCLA who may fall into the third round, but is the draft where we answer a position where you need an explosive ball hawk of a player?

7) What do we do about our offensive play calling.  Really?  Switching out coordinators particularly out of the West Coast means putting all these young kids (at receiver) into learning mode and spending a season adjusting to it.  Can we trust Schumer to improve?

So many questions, but truly this year did bring some essential answers for building a winning program.  Offensive Line is paramount and our took huge strides to become a very good one.  Our new MLB is a beast and a gamer, and our secondary is actually not that bad (don't judge Bartell the guy has played hurt all year).  Now what do you think?

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Wow, I think that's one long post...

To your points:
1. Draft & FA are both options. We can draft one, but if the Browns draft one we then know Quinn is expendable and we could grab him. There are other options as well.
2. Let’s see what C.Ogbonnaya can do before we draft another RB. I do know Darby isn’t the answer and should go away.
3. It would be best for the Rams to let Barron go. Too many penalties and not enough motivation. We have talent currently on the team that can play on the right side.
4. We actually have enough talent that when healthy we have a good WR corp wout a true #1.
5. Suh would be a big help. Add another DE wthe 2 pick or FA. Sign a rookie or three after the draft [undrafted rookies].
6. I say draft a LB to help out. Currently our LB corps isn’t bad. They are young and learning. All considered I think the DL needs more help.
7. Find another OC that has more ‘experience’ calling plays and evaluating the talent on the offense. Put the players into positions to make plays. Even tho it’s a WC offense, throw it down the field a little more often. Mix it up a bit. Where do I stop?!!

by RamsFan1979 on Dec 6, 2009 10:13 PM CST reply actions  

Ogbonnaya

Saw his highlights in college and he looked extremely capable, big downhill runner and shockingly a sure handed receiver. Never even tried him out.

by No1Betta on Dec 6, 2009 10:18 PM CST up reply actions  

We didn't even try Ogbonnaya out in preseason really

I don’t know why we’re not even looking at him. I think he should actually be active in the coming weeks and leave out Gado or Darby. We know what they can give us and they are not making any big contributions that would cause us to lose in their absence. So why keep them up when we have an unproven player looking to prove himself. If we don’t give him a shot it was a complete waste of a draft pick, albeit a 7th rounder, but still a draft pick. Gado and Darby cost us nothing. Let’s see what he can do in the limited playing time Gado and Darby get behind Jackson. Also I think signing Derrick Johnson would be all we need for LBs, but I wouldn’t complain if we took D Johnson and/or Muckelroy or Sturdivant in the third round, although I’d rather spend the middle picks on offense. First two can go defense, but we need offense from somewhere.

Can't think of a good sig

by Carneros on Dec 6, 2009 10:26 PM CST up reply actions  

It isn't the West Coast offense that's the problem.

Supposedly Shurmur learned the offense with the Eagles. I see McNabb making throws down the field all the time. I don’t see us making any. Shurmur isn’t running the Eagles West Coast offense. He’s running a scared, immature offense that isn’t close to the true West Coast offense. He has to go for us to have any chance of serious improvement in offense. SHURMUR MUST GO!!!

by andyrose on Dec 6, 2009 11:32 PM CST reply actions  

no question...

I see very little of the Eagles type offense… mainly very little stretching of the field. “But he doesn’t have the playes.” I say BS.. Avery is healthy now… get some balls

"The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall." - Vince Lombardi

by VTramsFan on Dec 7, 2009 12:55 AM CST up reply actions  

& yes add Ogbonnaya to the list

of “where to hell are they?” Really wondering where we are headed offensively. Defensively, we know where we are and what we are… offensively, we aren’t using our players or our time wisely.

"The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall." - Vince Lombardi

by VTramsFan on Dec 7, 2009 12:57 AM CST up reply actions  

We don't have the Receivers to pull off an Eagle offense

 Have we forgotten the Rams were relagated to grabbing Philly’s discarded WR scraps less than 2 months ago? To say nothing of the fact that these are new coaches installing a new system, and it doesn’t get to the Eagles level in 11 games. Eagles have had years to get it right, with better talent, so it’s not a good straight comparison.

Rams intended to run much more than Eagles do too, which I think is a good thing. Necesitated by our talent level at QB, WR and RB, sure…but still a good thing.

Not apples to apples, my friends.

by CoachConnors on Dec 8, 2009 2:57 PM CST up reply actions  

It's true our receivers don't match those of the Eagles,

but does that mean the only passes we can throw are one yard passes into the flat? Where are the slants, the down and in patterns, etc.? We don’t do anything to make the defense worry in the slightest about passes. Our receivers aren’t that bad.

by andyrose on Dec 8, 2009 10:17 PM CST up reply actions  

No, it doesn't mean that

It just means the Rams offense can’t do what the Eagles can do, and the two can’t be compared.

Its not just the recievers talent level — it’s also everyone learning a new system, it’s the O-line gelling to give the QB time, etc. The downfield passing attack needs a lot more to be successful, compared to handing it to Jackson and letting him stomp through the line.

by CoachConnors on Dec 10, 2009 12:07 PM CST up reply actions  

With a few notable exceptions

our QBs have had time to throw the last few games. Maybe not time to consistently throw 50 yarders, but certainly to throw 10 – 20 yarders. If we’re going to give up and run Jackson into the line so we only lose by 10 points instead of by 30, why don’t we let some of the young guys play so we can see what we’ve got? Why just throw the games away without even trying to win? Or is our strategy to gain the top draft pick? If so, we’re doing pretty well since we are now in the top spot since Cleveland beat the Steelers.

by andyrose on Dec 10, 2009 10:54 PM CST up reply actions  

There ya go

43 passes thrown against the Titans, a couple more pass plays where the ball didn’t actually get thrown.
Only 17 rushes by SJax.

I won’t ask if you guys feel better now that they’re throwing.

by CoachConnors on Dec 13, 2009 6:33 PM CST up reply actions  

I REALLY want to know

what is thought of Null. In the preseason he looked good and thought he showed good and bad flashes. Mostly stuff that can be coached. If he’s not ready than why cut Berlin? And why is there talk of bringing him back? Null must have really regressed for the coahces to not have confidence he can play at this level.
Or is it he can play, but the Rams are saving him for next year, where W’s will count more?!!

by RamsFan1979 on Dec 7, 2009 11:57 AM CST reply actions  

he looked decent against 3rd string defenders....just saying

also the reason we cut berlin is because berlin is past that ‘developmental stage’
Your 3rd QB is supposed to be a young QB who you think you have a decent chance of developing into a future starter. Berlin has had a few years, and has proven he can’t do much.

by jb22 on Dec 7, 2009 5:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Pat Shurmur is not running the West Coast offense

The Rams have focused on running way too much to be called a West Coast offense. This team has relied on Jackson to be the horse like no WC offense ever has. They run first (as many of you have noted) and seem to pass when they have to.

West Coast: think Bill Walsh/ Don Coryell emphasis on passing as a main stay….that’s not what the Rams do, it’s not even what they said they would try to do, and it’s an offense that requires a lot of timing and communication between QB and WR’s (meaning, time to gel).

by CoachConnors on Dec 8, 2009 3:15 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors

Mardygilyardsig_small Tevin T. Broner

Bradford_draft_small buckeyefan55

Tst_small T.Ram

Images_small Brick Top

Small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich