Jackson, Boller and the Seahawks
While you're waiting and wondering if Kyle Boller's play action bootleg can get the St. Louis Rams another win, there's some injury news we've got to talk about this morning.
Obviously, there's the Bulger situation. As much as we all were ready to see Bulger move on to other pursuits, the thought of Boller under center doesn't have anyone too excited. More on that later. What ought to concern Rams fans more than anything is Steven Jackson lower back.
The Rams have placed undue weight on SJ's shoulders this season, asking him to carry a mostly futile offense save for him. Jackson has a lower back sprain, something that injury guru Will Carroll says "could affect his workload." Seattle's no great shakes on defense without Tatupu, but they have been somewhat effective against starting running backs. The last rusher to gain more than 100 yards against the Seahawks was Frank Gore in week two. However, teams are running enough to set up their passing game, which has spelled certain doom for the Seahawks lately. Last week, the Vikings ran for a total of 157 yards on 37 carries, and the week before, the Cardinals ran for a total of 152 yards on 26 carries and scored two rushing touchdowns.
So maybe, they don't have to use Jackson excessively. Of course, if they don't, that puts more onus on Boller and the receivers. It's a favorable matchup for a passing game, but how favorable a matchup is it for the Rams passing game?
Personally, I don't think we lose anything with Boller in for the injured Bulger. Bulger has been too inconsistent - mostly he's played poorly - to be relied upon from week to week. Sure, he gives you the best chance to win, when he's on his game, but when was that going to be?
As for Boller, am I excited about him starting? No, but this is a rebuilding team without a clearly anointed QB of the future, who would otherwise step in this week and give us a glimpse of hope. Like I said above, the difference between having Boller or Bulger starting this year is negligible. The receiver picture should at least be a little more settle for Boller this time around. Danny Amendola has had some time in the system. Donnie Avery is playing much better than he was the last time Boller started, and Brandon Gibson could be a reliable possession guy for Boller. Then of course, there's Fells in the mix at TE. The offensive line is playing much better now too. Hopefully, the players sense the opportunity and play their best football, making life easier on the QB.
What has been working for the Rams on offense lately is opening the field with deeper passes, getting the ball to guys somewhere past five yards. Boller loses something in his accuracy the further he throws, but he's not completely incompetent in that department. Pat Shurmur will have to trust the guy a little more, fighting the urge to draw inward and be more conservative with the playcalling.
0 recs |
6 comments
|
Comments
"Personally, I don't think we lose anything with Boller in for the injured Bulger."
Someone apparently didn’t watch the San Fransisco game. I drove 600 miles from LA to San Fran to watch Kyle Boller thow across his body right into the laughing hands of Patrick Willis while a bunch of a-hole 49er fans heckled me for Boller’s idiocy.
Start Null since we’re all moving on. I don’t think I can stand 6 weeks of Kyle Boller. Let’s see what Little Brady can do. ;P
"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."
"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."
-Kobe Bryant
A mantra for all athletes.
by TrojanRam on Nov 25, 2009 9:44 AM CST via mobile reply actions
I'm with Null too
I agree that Bulger’s contract situation necesitates the Rams finding another starting QB.
Since that’s the case,
and since this season is non-competitive already,
and we already avoided the dreaded Oh-Fer,
and since drafting the “QB of the future” is a possible consideration,
and since we just drafted a young QB with a 6th round pick,
I can’t find any legitimate reason not to get Null in the game. Later in the season doesn’t really help the situation, in fact that just cuts down on the potential scouting we can do of him.
Null’s obviously not starting this game, but he really should be playing within a couple weeks, at least. I get that the coaches have determined, in their infinite wisdom, that he isn’t ready to start right now. But I also know there’s no real way to gauge his value and potential without giving the guy at least some playing time.
What if he goes off and plays out of his mind? You want to see that in the last game of the season, or would you be clamoring to have him follow that up with another game to prove it wasn’t a fluke? Wouldn’t that just completely confuse things, to have just one very good game from Null heading into the offseason?
Null’s time is now. Or very soon.
by CoachConnors on Nov 25, 2009 1:02 PM CST up reply actions
Guess who else was picked
in the 6th round… Bulger. Nothing like coincidences.
by loyal2therams on Nov 25, 2009 2:23 PM CST up reply actions
agreed coach
i think it may be too soon to start Null now, but we do need to get him in the game soon. I think starting him against tennessee would be a little rough, so we should start him at chicago and see where to go from there. this is no matter how good or bad Boller does against the hags.
"SJAX" - The extra strength cleaner that fights off that Stubborn, Stingy Defense
vanram the cards and vickings ran on them because they can pass the ball
if the sea chikens all day long are lining up with 8 in the box they can put a hurt on our running game to say the least ,they try to do that to the vickings i saw the game but Bret started to burn them so they had to back off and still they did a good job stoping A.D. for most of the game,now our OL is not in the best shape so i think were in for a hard game with them ,Boller will strugle i can tell you that because they can bring a good pass rush and i hope we put in Null , dam lets see the kid what do we have to lose

by 


























