The PBP: offensive line basics, and the education of Jason Smith (pt. 1)
It's back to the projector, TSTers. Today, we're going to look at the offensive line, some run blocking basics, Jason Smith and what makes Pro Bowlers different than albino bowlers. Not that I have anything against albino bowlers, but I don't see why they should have their own action figure and the great OTs in the history of the NFL don't. Just saying. Oh, and Sandra Bullock.
I smell... I smell a projector. A playbook projector! KA-BOOM!
So today all begins with Sandra. Dear, Sandra...
Sandra Bullock (you're welcome)

In case you don't watch television, or read, well, anything, she's playing the lead in the new movie The Blind Side, which I have no intention of seeing probably ever. On the other hand, the book, by Michael Lewis, is a great read. Not as good IMO as Moneyball and certainly less influential, but a good read nonetheless.
The Blind Side (the important version)
The book is essentially a human story (which you of course know is the compelling and sympathy-yanking tale of Michael Oher's rise to the upper echelons of college football prospect-ery) laid on top of his analysis of the evolution of the left tackle position and its' importance at the NFL level. Here's the quick rundown:
With the advent of the forward pass, the value of the quarterback skyrocketed, especially once Bill Walsh introduced his genius to his opponents. The real risk, as evidenced by Lawrence Taylor, was that right-handed quarterbacks were very susceptible to injuries, especially career-truncating ones, if a talented pass rusher could escape the left tackle and attack a quarterback from behind, i.e. "the blind side." The amount of money being poured into quarterbacks motivated franchises to protect their investments by getting the best pass-blocking left tackles money could buy. Consider this. From 1967-1985 (the last draft before Lawrence Taylor ended Joe Theismann's career), an average of 2.68 offensive tackles were taken in the first round. AT (that's after Theismann), 3.6. On to modern times.
In the first two rounds of the 2009 draft, eight tackles were selected, with the first being Jason Smith. Of course, in drafting him, we knew were getting a bit of a project; however, that term didn't necessarily apply to his pass protection. His athleticism lent itself very naturally to pass protection in being able to slide as well as anyone at the college level. It's something he's shown a proficiency for at the NFL level. What was a concern was his run blocking. Compared to Andre Smith, considered the best run blocker in the draft, Jason Smith was about 25 lbs. lighter. With Alex Barron still holding down the LT spot, Smith's run blocking skills (or lack thereof at times) have been on full display. As Van noted recently, he (and by extension the Rams) have gotten much better as of late. Let's look at what run blocking involves and how well Jason Smith has done.
Run Blocking 101 ("I'm kind of a big deal")
Bear in mind the terms of these blocks aren't universally set, so what one person calls a double or triple-team block, others call a "wedge" block.
The Drive Block
When you think of the most basic block, you're probably thinking of the drive block. The technique is relatively simple - get under your opponent, and "drive" him back. This block is the source of the verb "to decleat" which is when you lift someone off the ground, thus removing their cleats from the turf.
The Shoulder Block
Essentially, you have three areas you can block a rusher: through the shoulder pads, through the waist, and through the thigh. Going from head to toe, or in this case chest to thigh, this is the second progression. This term is the most oft repeated one I heard in high school levels in Texas, though it's confusing. A lineman can drive block with his shoulder and he can "shoulder" block with his hands. Still, the idea is to attacks the torso of the defender to gain leverage, driving him upwards and backwards as opposed to the drive block where you attack him at the shoulder level.
The Cut Block
The most controversial of the three, the cut block is designed for the offensive lineman to put his helmet or shoulder pad through the defender's thigh. I say again - the thigh. Not the knee. When you see quarterbacks delivering "dirty" hits (say Brett Favre in the preseason, Mark Sanchez in week _ or Brady Quinn against the Ravens), announcers often times categorize it as a cut block. Even offensive linemen are afforded that leeway when it's not warranted, giving the cut block a stigma it doesn't deserve. Cut blocks are often the blocks of choice in zone blocking, but we're comparing blocking styles to schemes, so lets look at that latter category.
BLOCKING SCHEMES
The Cross Block
In a cross block, a pair of linemen essentially swap positions. The more outside lineman will cross in front first while the inside lineman slides behind:
The Fold Block
A fold block is similar to a cross block, except that it is specifically designed to release a blocker against a LB. In a fold block, the lineman blocking the defensive lineman, or "down" defensive man, will engage first while the lineman assigned to "fold" will step behind his teammate and then press forward to engage the LB:

The Scoop Block
A scoop block creates a seal on a LB by allowing the lineman closest to the down lineman to initiate contact until the second O-lineman can engage. Then, the initial lineman peels off to drive block the LB:

The Trap Block
The trap involves a couple more players. In short, the scheme pulls a lineman away from the playside (the side where the ball carrier is expected to go) to "trap" an incoming pass rusher:
Obviously, in altering any of these slightly or combing them, you get some pretty complex blocking schemes. That's what offensive coordinators and offensive line coaches get paid for. In the end, though, it's up to the players to execute...and get paid even more. In the second part of this series, we'll look at how well Jason Smith has done in applying some of these in his rookie NFL season. Here's a preview:
The Application (turning potential into protection)
Week 2 @ Washington
1st & 10 at STL 40 - 12:57, 1st Q
After Bulger hits Laurent Robinson for quick first down (sigh), the Rams set up in the shotgun for a running play to the right side. Here's how it looks presnap:

The golden arrow is pointed at Jason Smith; the maroon arrow highlights veteran DE Philip Daniels who Smith has to block. Incognito is going to double with Jason Brown to move DT Cornelius Griffin out of the way. If Smith can deal with Daniels, Steven Jackson is going to have some room. Notice I said if, because this doesn't go well:

Smith's initial move is backwards, and I don't know why. He's isolated on Daniels, so he should have engaged him. Once he makes his initial step, it gives Daniels all the room he needs. At this point, the play is pretty much a done deal:

You'll only see one arrow - that's Jason Smith trying to push Daniels somewhere, anywhere but where he is. He's already disrupted the play, and Jackson has had the ball for a step and a half:
Everyone gets piled up in the middle as the play results in a Smith-Daniels-Jackson sandwich. A loss of 1.5, and a horrible way for Smith to get his day started in the run blocking game.
Don't worry - it gets better. Much better. See you guys next time, and don't be late to class!
0 recs |
16 comments
|
Comments
it looks like
Smith was supposed to let the DE rush upfield while brown and incognito seal the tackle, letting SJax hit the B gap.
by jb22 on Nov 21, 2009 1:09 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Sure
but you can’t take a first step as determined as he did without ensuring that the DE is rushing the outside. I’ve got a case where this happened against Indy and Smith handled Freeney perfectly, but in this case, he assumed he was getting something he didn’t and it ruined the play.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
by 3k on Nov 21, 2009 1:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
true
rookie mistake by smith. he’ll learn
did anyone notice that the Skins had 10 players within 5-7 yards from the line of scrimmage, despite the fact that the Rams had 4 wide receivers on the play. (or is that a TE. can’t tell. either way)
by jb22 on Nov 21, 2009 1:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
1 TE, 3 WR
And that’s called the Steven Jackson Effect
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
by 3k on Nov 21, 2009 1:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
which is exactly why
i don’t understand the point of all these shotgun pump-fake-draw/inside draw/delay handoffs. Just line up in the power I and go.
They know we are going to run the ball.
We know we are going to run the ball.
Why do we even bother lining up receivers. Might as well go goal line formation the entire field
by jb22 on Nov 21, 2009 2:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's part of the chess match
And sure, it’s easy in retrospect to say that, but consider the play before was a pass.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
by 3k on Nov 21, 2009 2:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i was kidding about the goal line formation
I understand that we need to give the defense different looks, even if some plays don’t work just to keep the defense honest. But no matter what formation the Rams line up in, the D almost always has 8 or 9 players in the box as long as Steven Jackson is lined up in the backfield.
A play like a shotgun formation inside draw depends on the assumption that the D will see the 3 or 4 WR’s, play the pass, leaving only 6 or 7 in the box. Without a FB or a second TE in there to block, this is a play that needs to be called at the right time.
Put it this way. When the Rams have the ball, and its First and 10, everyone in the stadium knows that the Rams are going to hand the ball off to SJax. But usually, Steven manages to get 4-5 yards, despite the fact that the D had all 11 guys on him. Most often, this play is run with Karney in, or with two TE. We’re not trying to hide the fact that we’re going to run the ball. We’re not trying to trick the D, or catch them in the wrong coverage or anything like that. It’s just pure power vs. power, and in recent weeks that’s a match-up that seems to be working for the Rams.
The Ram’s offense isn’t versatile enough for these sorts of runs to have any effect at all.
Like I said, they know the Ram’s are going to run the ball. The best approach is to just lower their heads and push straight ahead instead of getting cute with the play-calling.
by jb22 on Nov 21, 2009 7:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Id agree that we haven't fed the effect
That’s part of what has kept Bulger and Avery from racking up stats – the lack of passes in general. If we could drive the ball more effectively with the pass, these runs would be more explosive.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
by 3k on Nov 21, 2009 7:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Because that wouldn't work
The 53 as one have become the 53 that won.
by Carneros on Nov 21, 2009 5:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
if this thing with Avery and Gibson is really does prove to be clicking...
then the Rams can burn some teams on those 3 WR sets.
Not saying it’s going to be the saving grace, but if it has some potential it could make games fun to watch.
Turf Show Times
by VanRam on Nov 21, 2009 7:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Another look?
It was mentioned in the article that Smith “took a first step back for some unknown reason”. In that play, it looks to me that it was designed to let Daniels “overplay” (get to deep into the backfield), with Smith to his strong side. SJ was supposed to execute a “quick pop” and be past Daniels, with Cogs and Brown disengaging and proceeding to block the LBs, which it appears they were doing. It was the LG that failed in his assignment to stop the Washington DL from “flowing” to the play. Smith’s assignment is time limited, and with SJ delayed, Daniels had the opp. to make a move on SJ along with the “flowing” DL. Driving your man back is not always in the scheme, as many agressive DL guys can be defeated by letting them “overun” the point of attack. Thoughts?
by Knoxfan on Nov 21, 2009 10:44 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
True
But Smith overplayed the overplay. It’s essentially a one man trap, designed to allow the DE to rush to open up the lane; however, if the DE doesn’t move outside, the OT has to be prepared to deal with him and create that lane. In the play I used for the screenshots, Jackson looks at the hole that should be there, realizes Daniels has gotten inside of Smith, and tries to create. Sure, the double team wasn’t effective against Cornelius Griffin, the DT Incognito and Brown teamed on before Incognito would have released, but Smith’s error made them a secondary concern to Daniel’s penetration.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
by 3k on Nov 21, 2009 11:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"Overplaying the overplay"
I guess a lot of rookie OT outsmart themselves. An experienced DE knows how to make a youngin’ pause and think rather than react. It’s the ol’ single-man sucker trap that entices a rookie to overplay the overplay. (cheez-I must have really got off typing all that) Well said 3K.
by Knoxfan on Nov 22, 2009 12:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
RB's meeting with OL's
Interesting quote in the PD (linked in VanRam’s post today Nov 22). SJ39 talks about how the RB’s have a protection meeting with the linemen and how they go through extra walk throughs together to make sure they’re all on the same page. After the disasterous blown blitz pickups in pre-season, it’s good to know they made a point of putting extra emphasis on the protection. And obviously it is coming together, slowly but surely.
by CoachConnors on Nov 22, 2009 1:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 




























