2010 prospect watch (QB edition) - Oct. 6th
Draft talk tends to pick up early when your team struggles out of the gate as badly as the Rams have. We've seen it in comments and in FanPosts, so I figured it might be useful to take stock of the QBs coming out and how they've fared over the first five weeks of college football.
In case you're not a college kind of guy, here's an update from ESPN's odd couple, Mel Kiper, Jr., and Todd McShay:
My top 10 QB prospects for the 2010 NFL draft as of October 6th after fold.
Just for reference, here's my first 2010 mock draft from back in May once this year's draft closed. I'm not so sure we're going to have the 10th pick anymore, but time shall tell.
This is how my top 10 QB board looks with their performances thus far graded by the All-Knowing Thumb of Power (* denotes eligible underclassmen):
1
Sam Bradford*, Oklahoma
Since injuring his shoulder in the Sooners' season opening loss to BYU, Bradford has yet to step on the field, so his stock remains relatively unchanged. It looks like he'll make his return Saturday against Baylor, but with the damage done to Oklahoma in his absence (2-2 through the first four games), his chances of bringing a national championship to Norman are pretty much out the window. That leaves his legacy and draft stock as the two things to play for. Both rest on how he responds to the injury.
Next notable evaluation: Oct. 17 vs. #2 Texas (neutral site), 12:00pm ET (ABC)
2
Jevan Snead*, Ole Miss
Snead has played very poorly this year, but I'm not willing to drop him to number 3 yet. His QB skills are still too high: quick release, above average arm strength & good footwork to start with. His problem this year has been his decision making. The Rebels' last game against Vanderbilt is a great example. Snead threw for 3 touchdowns, but matched those with 3 interceptions. Granted, his wide receivers don't compare to the better offenses in the SEC, but given his experience, he shouldn't be making some of the throws he has this season.
Next notable evaluation: Oct. 10 vs. #3 Alabama, 3:30pm ET (CBS)
3
Jake Locker*, Washington
Unlike Snead whose stock has dropped significantly, Locker's has exploded, evidenced by his rise to #6 on McShay's big board (ESPNinsider). He's big, strong, fast, and most impressively this season, smart. Whereas Snead has made far too many questionable throws, Locker has made the right decisions game in, game out.
Next notable evaluation: Oct. 24 vs. #13 Oregon, time and broadcast TBD
4
Colt McCoy, Texas
McCoy has played fine so far, but Texas has had a very easy road to start their 2009 campaign. They've won their first four by an average of 34.25 points, so they're not facing great competition. Beating up on Louisiana-Monroe, UTEP and Wyoming (sorry, Van) doesn't make for the better teams Texas will face as they get into Big XII play and drive towards a BCS Championship game.
Next notable evaluation: Oct. 17 vs. #19 Oklahoma (neutral site), 12:00pm ET (ABC)
5
Jimmy Clausen*, Notre Dame
Jimmy, the third Clausen to grace the college football stage this decade, has a great trio of blatant skills: defense identification, accuracy and football intelligence. He has developed well each year at Notre Dame, but he does have two great receivers to work with in Michael Floyd and Golden Tate (A+ name). His arm strength is suspect as well, but his accuracy has been able to overcome that deficiency so far this season. Had Michigan not beaten the Irish with some late game heroics, Notre Dame would be a hot team going into their next game, the annual clash between ND & USC.
Next notable evaluation: Oct. 17 vs. #7 USC, 3:30pm ET (NBC)
6
Tony Pike, Cincinnati
Next notable evaluation: Oct. 15 at #23 South Florida, 7:30pm ET (ESPN)
7
Dan LeFevour, Central Michigan
Next notable evaluation: Oct. 17 at Western Michigan, 3:30pm ET
8
Tim Hiller, Western Michigan
Next notable evaluation: Oct. 17 vs. Central Michigan, 3:30pm ET
9
Jarrett Brown, West Virginia
Next notable evaluation: Oct. 10 at Syracuse, 12:00pm ET
10
Zac Robinson, Oklahoma St.
Next notable evaluation: Oct. 17 vs. Missouri, 9:15pm ET (ESPN2)
There ya go. The chances one of these guys is drafted by the Rams next year are pretty damn high at this point, so this is definitely something I'll be keepin tabs on throughout the year. Holler.
0 recs |
18 comments
|
Comments
needs
here’s something I’d like to hear people weigh in on: With a big need at WR, and most likely just one first round pick, do the Rams go with a QB or WR?
If they’re picking in the top three, are there any top three worthy WRs at this point? Or does picking a WR just make the Detroit comparisons all too real?
I’ve moved firmly into the QB camp, sorry Null fans.
Turf Show Times
by VanRam on Oct 6, 2009 9:40 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If Bulger can't go...
Null needs to play this year so the team can draft a QB. I doubt any QB will really shine in this shitty Shurmur system though.
by 81 Witness on Oct 6, 2009 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Shurmus is still hear next year we better find away to get 10 first rounders
because it we’ll need them to have Shurmur’s offense work
SHURMUR NEEDS TO GO
by Carneros on Oct 6, 2009 10:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Every year over the past 5...
I’ve been firmly out of the “Draft a QB” camp.
This year I’m all for a QB in the 1st.
I like Dez Bryant at WR and all, but I don’t think there will be any Calvin Johnson, can’t miss WR in this draft class.
Draft McCoy and his buddy Jordan Shipley in the second or third. Or even Golden Tate in the second (can’t believe that he’ll stay that low)
Future Redbirds! www.futureredbirds.net
Rams Gab! www.ramsgab.com
by jroman on Oct 6, 2009 10:49 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
can't get enough
I can never stop talking about the draft, regardless of the time of year!
Future Redbirds! www.futureredbirds.net
Rams Gab! www.ramsgab.com
by jroman on Oct 6, 2009 10:49 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm all for
Jake Locker.
I don’t think he’s top 10 material yet though. But he seems like he has the skills.
Dangerous to take a QB in the top 10 it is.
Much to learn these young ones have.
Spagamania is in full bloom
by ram_rod on Oct 6, 2009 11:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Me too
He’s not top notch so he won’t cost as much. If he moves up in the class I’d have to look elsewhere because I don’t think we need to have top 5 talent. top 20 will do as long as they are pro-stylecaliber. I am and have always been, and will always be firmly in the trade down camp. We need way too many first day draft picks.
by dbcouver on Oct 6, 2009 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm firmly in the Dez Bryant camp...
And I’m actually more impressed with him than I have been with Michael Crabtree (before the holdout, based on football alone). I also think one of these QBs could be there in the second round. But drafting Bryant would give us a really good receiving corps IMO. Bryant, Avery , and Robinson (crosses fingers for his successful recovery). Burton could be pretty good at 4.
The best thing would be to trade that high pick (assuming we dont go 12-0 the rest of the season and win the SB, lmao) for multiple picks, either in the 1st or second round, since I see a need at OLB, DE, DT, and a solid RB backup as well (even though Steven likes being the lone guy, it sucks seeing him get pounded all day).
Hmm…Seattle has multiple 1st rounders right?If they are enamored with Bradford, and we have the #1, why don’t we trade that, get someone else on the list (like Snead) while taking Bryant? Hmm…so many scenarios. Damn you 3k! It’s only October! We still have 12 games and you best believe were going to improve! Go Rams!!! Much too early for this conversation!
by LARamsFan29 on Oct 6, 2009 11:58 AM CDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
those last 2 paragraphs
is talkin my language.
by dbcouver on Oct 6, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We need plenty of players, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Trading down is always good (when you get good value) but if their is a talent dropoff.
I would MUCH rather have a few high talented players then more semi-talented players. Let’s not forsake elite level players in the draft just because we have so many issues.
I believe in 2010
by ram_rod on Oct 6, 2009 4:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
3k because people like you listen to Mel Kiper is the only reason he has a job lol
by james535 on Oct 6, 2009 9:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
And because people vote
is the only reason we have presidents. I get your point, but should we all stop watching ESPN?
Your uncle molests collies.
by 3k on Oct 6, 2009 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um...yeah.
If there isn’t a game on (and right now I’m watching Mid Tennessee State vs Troy on the Deuce), I don’t watch ESPN at all. It’s complete garbage.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
by Tackle Box on Oct 6, 2009 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would say mostly garbage
From time to time, there’s something of value in that trash can.
Your uncle molests collies.
by 3k on Oct 7, 2009 4:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There might be
but I don’t want to wade through the shit to find a pearl. Btw, Sportscenter is an atrocity.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
by Tackle Box on Oct 7, 2009 7:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our QB of the future
Did well tonite: 389 yards passing and a TD
by dbcouver on Oct 11, 2009 1:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















