Has the Rams offensive line improved this season?
Despite some new faces in new places up front, the results look disturbingly familiar for the St. Louis Rams' offensive line. On the surface pass protection in the middle of the line has improved over last season, but run blocking seems to be too irratic to make a difference. What's the issue here? Is it a matter of balance or performance?
The Rams have legitimate offensive weapon in RB Steven Jackson, so the game plan for defending against their offense is simple: stop the run. Week after week teams stack the box with 8-10 defenders making holes difficult to open for the offensive line. Those teams concede the pass, knowing that the Rams don't have the talent at WR to do much more than chip away with 4, 5 and 6 yard passes.
Look at the Rams first half performance against the Colts last week. Jackson had one run that went for more than 4 yards, a 9-yard run on the first play of their last drive of the half. Somehow, the second half, third quarter anyway, was much different. Jackson broke off an 11-yard run on drive that featured two Alex Barron penalties. The next drive started with three consectutive runs of 10+ yards. It was great to see, even though the inconsistency from the first two quarters was maddening.
Let's look at some stats.
According to FO's OL numbers, the Rams are generating 3.81 adjusted line yards (through week 6) per carry. That's good enough for 19th in the NFL. Last year, the Rams had 3.73 adjusted line yards per carry. Statistically, things are better. But there are some troubling numbers within.
In "power" situations (defined as: Percentage of runs on third or fourth down, two yards or less to go, that achieved a first down or touchdown. Also includes runs on first-and-goal or second-and-goal from the two-yard line or closer) the Rams are successful just 44% of the time, ranked 30th in the league. Rams runners are being tackled at or behind the line of scrimmage (stuffed) 21% of the time (ranked 20th).
Compare those to last year. Power: 66%, ranked 16th; Stuffed: 19%, ranked 20th.
Though it doesn't paint a full picture, the decline in power success certainly does owe something to teams having only to concern themselves with Jackson. How much?
Now, let's look at directional stats, adjusted line yards and percentage of running plays through those five directions defined by FO.
| Direction | ALY | rank | Percentage |
| Left End | 6.76 | 1 | 8% |
| Left Tackle | 5.36 | 4 | 4% |
| Mid/Guard | 3.74 | 22 | 47% |
| Right Tackle | 3.97 | 20 | 20% |
| Right End | 2.30 | 26 | 20% |
Compare that to last season.
| Direction | ALY | Rank | Percentage |
| LE | 2.58 | 29 | 9% |
| LT | 3.68 | 25 | 17% |
| M/G | 3.76 | 26 | 51% |
| RT | 4.58 | 6 | 16% |
| RE | 3.29 | 26 | 8% |
First of all, why are they not running to the left side more? I suspect the numbers for the right side have something to do with the changes at RT where Smith and Goldberg have split playing time. The change from '08 to '09 also has to do with the more experienced Barron moving over to the left side. Still, lots of factors go into those numbers, so it's hard to break them down based exclusively on a player.
The one number that is a little surprising is the mid/guard number. There's been virtually no change despite the fact that the Rams signed free agents C Jason Brown and FB Mike Karney. Runs up the middle should be better. Of course, how much of that goes back to the stacking the box to counter Jackson more this year than last.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Someone correct me if I'm wrong
but didn’t all of Jackson’s 10+ runs happen with Goldberg was in at RT?
I don't know if all of them did.
but when the Rams went 3 straight times to the right, all for over 10 yards, Goldberg was the RT.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
Stacking the line
to prevent SJ from gaining yards, and effectively stopping our offense, should have the offense a lil’ pissed and play’n w/more concentration and tons of passion.
For some strange reason [/sarcasm] the offense hasn’t even come close to playing as a unit and it’s getting old real fast. The short routes are not effective and it doesn’t balance well when the field isn’t stretched a bit. Defenses are going to continue to play the same way until our other players can prove they’re worth the attention. I wonder why the OC doesn’t do something about this. What really sux, is the next OC will implement a new system… Martz anyone?
Martz
Martz can’t catch a ball downfield, nor can Shummer. Rain on recievers that haven’t played more than a couple of games as a unit, so much so that Bulger has to hunt them down on their routes. Thats just the way it is. Their is no blame to point to except bad luck.
Bad luck?
Maybe, but you can sway luck thru proper preparation, ie ball control. How about the play calling? Poor at best. Blame? Maybe it’s just ‘areas of improvement’.
I agree (to a point)
It was easier for me to find a scapegoat in bad luck than to blame the team. IMO I have to belive that the coaches play calling have been narrow because we don’t have the talent to run the really aggressive offence, nor blitz when the long ball coverage is so lacking. Aw what the heck-time for some more ribs and beer, bring on the Lions! GO RAMS!!!!!!
I don't think you can call it bad luck.
We don’t have the players or playcalling to run an effective offense. Saying we can’t pass because of bad luck is like saying the Rams are the best team in the NFL but can’t win because of bad luck. Maybe a little exaggerated, but look at our WR corps. Our number one is a small injury prone 2nd rounder, and then everyone else are the people that weren’t good enough or barely good enough to make other teams, not including Gibson since he hasn’t played yet, but he didn’t play with the eagles. And Burton was our pick but he wouldn’t make a lot of NFL teams, at least in a starting role.
Reserved-- been waiting 7 weeks to have this sig, I guess I can wait 1 more
The Mad Mike Martz Curse
Anemic offense after railroading M.M. out of town. Plus, Jason Brown cursed the Rams when he made early season statements about Rams.
What are the odds increasingly becoming for a scenario that for the first time ever, 2 teams during back-to-back seasons go 0-16?
If making statements about how awemone you're going to do is a curse,
then why did the Bengals kick the shit out of the Bears this past Sunday? Cedric Benson and Chad Ochocinco both ran their mouths about how awesome they were going to do and how the Bears couldn’t stop them and…..well…….the Bears couldn’t stop them.
Seems like just the opposite should have happened, right?
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
that he's not bad
i say put Smith on the left side, let him learn the ropes, lumps and all, and put Barron or Goldberg on the right side for run blocking.
Turf Show Times
by Ryan Van Bibber on Oct 27, 2009 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions
Dumpster
At our injury rate, we can’t even dump the janitor. We might need him as a backup somewhere.
Is there any drawback whatsoever to letting Smith learn on the left now?
It would be mismanagement to get out of this season without him learning the left.
Lived in LA during the Rams and Raiders days. Now based in NorCal, I am still a die hard Rams fan and Raiders season ticket holder.
by CoachConnors on Oct 27, 2009 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree
IMO all the rookies should really be tested now. Of course we are already playing most of them.
good point
i say learn as much as we can from what we got see what works and doesn’t because something seems off idk if its just me but somethings up.
by keeperskillz24 on Oct 27, 2009 10:51 PM CDT reply actions
0-16
This Ram team here is the worst team i have seen in my 55 years being a NFL football fan.What a disgrace,I go back to the era when the Rams were considered a powerhouse back in the 70`s.How far has this organization sunk.I blame it on Georgia Frontire .

by 





























