Turf Show Times: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Has Kentucky Improved Since the Non-Conference Season?

Overreaction Monday: Week 7 vs. Indianapolis

St. Louis Rams defensive end Leonard Little sits on the bench during the final minutes of the fourth quarter of an NFL football game against the St. Louis Rams, Sunday, Oct. 25, 2009, in St. Louis.  The Colts won 42-6, and the Rams made 3k sad.

More photos » Tom Gannam - AP

St. Louis Rams defensive end Leonard Little sits on the bench during the final minutes of the fourth quarter of an NFL football game against the St. Louis Rams, Sunday, Oct. 25, 2009, in St. Louis. The Colts won 42-6, and the Rams made 3k sad.

  Overreaction abounds this Monday morning.  Just check out the post-game overreaction from the usually rational Bryan Burwell.  His is the classic overreactor's demise - going from the optimistic overreaction to the pessimistic.  So let me join in on the fun.

 - Our secondary needs to work on ball recognition and pass deflection timing.  Often, yesterday, we had defenders who had positioned themselves for near-perfect coverage only to be undone by a perfectly lobbed pass by Peyton Manning.  Still, you have to think that better timing on the switch from player defense to ball defense would have negated some of the passing plays the Colts enjoyed yesterday.

 - Truncated overreaction #1: Steven Jackson is the greatest running back to ever play on a team as bad as the 2009 Rams.

 - Is there a bigger crapball than the WR orphanage we have set up?  (For context, a crapball is like a snowball except that it is made of crap, and as the crap rolls along, it just picks up more and more crap thus increasing its inherent size and crappiness).  Let's review some the craplights.  After the successful flea flicker to Donnie Avery on our first drive, we had a 1st and 10 at the Indy 14.  A 2 yard run set us up with a 2nd and 8 at the 12, a healthy position to be in, but the Rams squandered it by targeting Tim Carter in back to back plays.  Those two plays were the only two times he was targeted in the game, begging the question, why in the hell are you looking for Tim Carter in the red zone?  Where was Daniel Fells, a receiver who has shown he can produce in the end zone?  Why not use Steven Jackson?  As our best player, shouldn't we be relying on him more in the red zone than anywhere else on the field?  Mindboggling.  And Keenan Burton is killing me.  He has the hands and the footwork to be a solid complementary receiver to Donnie Avery, but his timing is still slow.  How much time does he need to develop into a productive 3rd WR?  Granted, he's been pressed into duty as our #2, but he's got to show a more consistent dedication to the details that separate a 8 yard hitch or out from an interception.  And I know we have enough issues to deal with from a personnel standpoint this offseason, but sometime soon, the Rams either need to promote Fells as the starter to see how viable he is or bring in a real TE.  Randy McMichael is useless.  On the bright side, Danny Amendola is proving to be a very solid addition to the team.  He finished with a team high 5 receptions for nearly 40 yards.  That is as much a point of approval for Amendola as it is a point of disapproval for Donnie Avery and Keenan Burton.

 - Truncated overreaction #2: Samkon Gado is still getting carries why?

 - Marc Bulger's situation is going to be very interesting, because he has played himself out of a future with the St. Louis Rams.  At what point that moment comes is yet to be seen.  Obviously, there's enough frustration among the fan base that were he to be cut this offseason, you wouldn't need many tissues to help the sobbing.  I wonder, though, if he would be of use next year to groom whoever we bring in to helm this team as we move ahead.  And yes, we need to bring in our next QB this offseason.  The question is, do we need Marc Bulger as a mentor next year, because if so, you have to assume he still gets the starting nod.  This is obviously a relatively touchy subject, so I'll leave at this for now because I know we'll get to it more thoroughly in the months ahead.

 - Truncated overreaction #3: The Colts have no shot at getting to the Super Bowl because their running game is a joke.

 - Lastly, I was unimpressed with Flajole's game plan.  We threw a lot of nickel and dime looks (as in formations, not as in Virgil Solozzo) that were exploited by Manning & Co. despite relatively tight coverage.  The real issue was how easy it was for Manning to get on schedule with Reggie Wayne early thanks to a lack of pressure.  Our D-line was inept yesterday when it came to getting pressure as a four man front.  Once Manning proved his ability to produce in spite of our coverage, I was hoping we'd throw some extra bodies at the Colts' O-line.  Ah, the audacity of hope.

 

 - Truncated overreaction #4: Overreacting is usually more accurate than reacting.

Poll
Which player has produced the more disappointing 2009 as of 7 games?
QB Marc Bulger
83 votes
WR Donnie Avery
41 votes
WR Keenan Burton
9 votes
TE Randy McMichael
29 votes
DE Chris Long
119 votes

281 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 52 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Great post

5 receptions for 40 yards, that sounds both good and bad.

Turf Show Times

by VanRam on Oct 26, 2009 9:42 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Bulger

Bulger will most likely not be cut this off season. Regardless of who the Rams draft at QB this year (Bradford, Locker, Clausen, McCoy, Pike), Bulger will have way more talent/experience than them. He will need to stick around to play the first few games of next season and help the new QB transition. Do you want our future franchise QB learning the ropes from Kyle Boller and Keith Null? And as much as some of you may hate Bulger, he would be the best #2 QB in the NFL, no doubt about it. Yeah he’d be pricey to keep as a backup, but he would be doing a lot more than standing on the sidelines. The rookie QB will have a lot of raw talent, but Bulger will need to help him realize and utilize his talent.

There is a very slim possibility that someone would want Bulger for a 7th round pick. Maybe Carolina could take a look at him. Or Tennessee?

by jb22 on Oct 26, 2009 9:43 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Chris Long

has become the new scape goat. Believe me, Chris Long is the least of our problems.

Anyone on the Rams that has “wide receiver” in their job description is disappointing this season.

Turf Show Times

by VanRam on Oct 26, 2009 9:44 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

i disagree

chris long was supposed to be a big time defensive end that lineman were supposed to have nightmares about before lining up against him. he’s the second overall pick, and should be farther along than he is right now.

wide receiver wise, we have a second round pick, a third round pick, and some dudes off the street. right now those guys are playing like a second round pick, a third round pick, and some dudes off the street.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 26, 2009 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chris Long

The thing about Long is that I don’t think many people remember what was being said about Long when he was coming out of college. Many scouts thought that Chris Long had reached his peak, and that he wasn’t going to get much better. While he did have a great senior year at Virginia, I dont know that you could have called him a sack machine, because Long’s game is much more than sacking the quarterback. He gets great pressure on the QB, and he plays the run well. I hope many of you weren’t expecting the next Mario Williams when we drafted Chris Long, because I surely wasn’t. I knew exactly what he was, a young energetic force that could help out on the d-line. Was he drafted a little high? Yes, but the Rams would surely have taken Jake Long had Miami passed on J. Long. I would not call Chris Long a bust, because its not his fault the Rams drafted him maybe a little higher than he should have gone (I still think C. Long was a top 15 pick that year). Forget the fact that he was drafted second overall, and appreciate the fact that we have a young DE (WHO IS ONLY IN HIS SECOND SEASON) that is still an above-average player.

Also, look at the Ram’s D-Line. Sacks are not a one man effort. We need a huge DT to take up a double team. C. Ryan seems to be stepping up his game recently, so maybe that will help Chris Long. Look at the Giants, the Steelers, the Ravens – why do they get to the QB so easily? Because pretty much everyone in their front 7’s is as good as or better than Chris Long. Give Spags some time people; he’ll find the players and he’ll make it work.

by jb22 on Oct 26, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agree with the majority of your post

furthermore, i am giving spags time to find the right players, and i still do believe long can be one of those players.

but i what i disagree with is your observation of him. i know he’s in on a lot of plays and does get decent pressure on the QB sometimes and hurries some throws, but there’s been a few weeks where he hasn’t even shown up on the stat sheet. he needs to learn to better get off his block and get in on tackling a running back.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 26, 2009 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

-2

I’m sorry, no. I’m in favor of not giving up on Long and if it’s my team to run I’d keep him and keep working with him, but no he doesn’t get “great” pressure on the QB, maybe he did in college, but you cannot say he does that now.

And to say his game is much more than sacking the quarterback…again, you can’t say that about him now. He has games with no stats whatsoever and I can’t honestly say that’s any thing more than sacking the QB, let alone much more.

I’ve seen him get run out by by opposing TE’s on running plays, and so far he’s a smaller guy who hasn’t the strength or the quickness or agility to physically beat his opponents on a consistant level.

I hate to admit this because I wanted them to draft him but he has not contributed like a first rounder yet. Call me crazy but I still think he works hard enough that yes he can develop into the job. But he’s not close yet

Lived in LA during the Rams and Raiders days. Now based in NorCal, I am still a die hard Rams fan and Raiders season ticket holder.

by CoachConnors on Oct 26, 2009 6:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

While I agree that the Colts running game is lackluster, your claim that the Colts don’t have a shot at making it to the Super Bowl because of that is hilariously ridiculous.

Hit em with your groin!

by KingRichard on Oct 26, 2009 10:03 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Did you read?

Because when I see the word “overreaction” I assume what is about to be said is an “overreaction”…..

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 26, 2009 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Truncated overreaction #5

Reading is for douches.

Your uncle molests collies.

by 3k on Oct 26, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

155 rushing yards

155 on the ground, with three big runs broken, is a “joke?”

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Oct 26, 2009 10:23 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

in all honesty

i was not impressed with the colts running game. the rams were able to effectively shut it down for three quarters, and only after the game was in hand were the colts finally able to fully exploit the rams’ run d for some big time yardage. now, i will give some of that credit to the rams run defense, as they have been decent for most of the year, but i was unimpressed throughout the day.

not that it matters, you have peyton manning on your team.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 26, 2009 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

to further exhibit this point

if you take away the long runs from each of the two backs yesterday, they have these lines:

addai: 19 carries, 52 yards, 2.7 yards/carry

simpson: 2 carries, 4 yards, 2 yards/carry

not very impressive.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 26, 2009 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

let me take it down for you

your team has the better RB and heres the #’s from yesterday for rushing

Colts- Net Yards Rushing 156
            Total Rushing Plays 26
            Average Gain per Rushing Play 6.0

 Rams-Net Yards Rushing 155
              Total Rushing Plays 30
              Average Gain per Rushing Play 5.2

Are those great numbers from the Colts? well yes actually they are considering our run game has been quite bad the past 2 seasons. We went in averaging 3.3 YPC and in this game alone averaged 6 in my eyes thats pretty good.
         
                      

Bob Sanders does not play Hide-and-Seek, He plays HIDE and PRAY-HE-DOES-NOT FIND-YOU!

by coltsfan723 on Oct 26, 2009 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

so, Steven Jackson and Joseph Addai (et al)

were all running against the same defense? So, are you saying the Rams could stack the line knowing that Peyton Manning had no ability or quality receivers to attack with?

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 26, 2009 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

like i mentioned before, if you take away the outliers for all backs involved

colts:

net yards rushing: 59
total rushing plays: 19
average gain: 3.1

rams:

net yards rushing: 124
total rushing plays: 25
average gain: 5.0

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 26, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um huh?

“Take away the long runs.”

Sure, why not. I guess if we took away certain stats that don’t back up your argument, it makes you look smart. Taking away Simpson’s 30 yard TD run is only TAKING AWAY A 30 YARD TD RUN!

And not counting Donald Brown’s two carries (both went for over 20 yards I believe, with on going for 45) before he got hurt and left the game, then yeah. The Colts running game looked pretty bad.

And I guess if we took away Peyton Manning’s 3 TDs, he’d look like he had a pretty bad game too. Maybe if we took 42 points off the board, Indy would look even worse!

You can’t be taken seriously when you decide to exclude key stats (like oh, say, a 45 yard run off the left side) when making a point. The Colts had some negative plays running. Wow. BFD. They ran for 155 yards on 23 attempts and scored a TD. They were 4-4 running in short yardage. If their running game didn’t look good to you, especially considering Donald Brown was running all over the place prior to getting hurt, you don’t know football.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Oct 26, 2009 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i'm not disregarding the long runs

but they are what they are. they scew final numbers and raise averages to make the day appear decent for the colts when really is was an average/mediocre day.

i’ve always thought the goal of a running game was to control the game tempo and win the time of possession battle. if you’re able to do that successfully, you should be able to win a game. in all honesty, the colts were not able to control the clock yesterday with their ground game. the broke off some long runs that ended in touchdowns yes, but that’s not the point. steven jackson was able to control the clock a little bit with this runs yesterday, joseph addai was not able to do the same.

in a set of data, you always remove the outliers. if you remove the outliers for your backs (and yes, i’m excluding simpson because he was only in the game because brown got hurt and got his long TD run in garbage time when the rams d had given up), they had a pretty average day. if you remove the outliers from steven jackson’s day, he still rushed for over 5 yards a carry.

i’m not discounting the long runs, i’m simply stating the colts running game was not able to accomplish what you want to be able to accomplish with a sound running game.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 26, 2009 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

bro, are you serious here ? To try and compare any facet of the Rams team to the Colts team is a pipe dream at best, the freaking colts don’t need a run game at all and they still whip our boys even had they known that Peyton was throwing it every single play, they still couldn’t stop him and still would of lkost big so stop with the fanatical blinders about the rams bro they suck the sooner you see the light the sooner reality will return,lol

by peteyweestro on Oct 26, 2009 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

dude

notice how i said this at the end of the first post:

“not that it matters, you have peyton manning on your team.”

i know the colts don’t need to have a running game to succeed, which is why they are as good as they are. i’m also not comparing any parts of the rams team to the colts team, i’m just stating the fact that the colts were not able to control the clock with their running game like the rams were with some of their drives.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 26, 2009 11:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um....

And Jackson was running against a T2 nickel defense that shockingly expected the Rams to make an attempt to win the game and played pass coverage. What maroons! Look, not knocking the Rams, but if they want to run the ball the entire second half and have a 20.0 ypc average to uh…control the clock so that they could uh…to um… Wait, it was 21 to 3 at the half.. Well, call me crazy but I have no problem giving up a 5.0 ypc average to a team that’s losing by 18 and running out the clock on themselves. It was pretty obvious that the Rams weren’t really trying to win, they just didn’t want to lose by as much.

Pretty much why it’s kind of funny people were throwing fits about us giving up so many yards to the Dolphins. We were never more than a possession away from tying or taking the lead, why would we take a risk and have Brown throw a cheap touchdown to a wide open RB?

Pretty sure that if we’re learning anything from the first half of the season, it’s that the entire “Run the ball no matter what against the Colts and just keep Peyton off the field.” is kind of not working anymore. Think teams may want to try to figure out a different gameplan. Went from dropping 8 the first part of his career to blitzing the crap out of him to essentially using their rushing offense to be their defense. Well, looks like he’s figured them all out so far.

Jim Sorgi runs a 4.6 40. That's all I've got to say about that.

by monstersbox on Oct 27, 2009 8:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You want to take away useless run stats?

How about when the colts were 21-3 up and the rams still ran it? They had given up the game, and were running the ball, knowing it would never give them the lead. We knew that, so played pass defence knowing you could run all day and we would win. When the game was still up for grabs, Jackson had 8 carries for 20 yards. The rest of his runs were at pass defences. As for the colts it was the opposite, both teams knew the colts wanted to run and keep the clock going, so it made it harder for them, but even then we were 4/4 on 3rd and short.

Your skewing the stats unbelievably, all aspects of the rams game was awful.

by ColtsUK on Oct 27, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

we don't take him seriously anyway

        He’s kind of like someones pet here

by dbcouver on Oct 26, 2009 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

i’m one of the few with a brain and logical thinking. i’m the perfect choice to not be taken seriously.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 26, 2009 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

GOTTA LOVE THE COMMENTS!

HAHA He’s someone’s pet.. and a legend in his own mind. Thanks for the chuckle guys, it was worth coming over to this thread! cheers and good luck to the rams in the future ;-)

by ColtKing on Oct 27, 2009 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your taking the wrong average

I think people really should start looking at the median as the average rather then the mean, itd give a much better idea of how the run game did.

by ColtsUK on Oct 27, 2009 7:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree wholeheartedly with this post, with exception of the Colts not making the SB.

The current Rams are dysfunctional in every facet of the game. The only thing I can think of to save this team from more years of perennial losing is to get a new owner with deep pockets. Somebody’s gotta spend a gazillion bucks for an infusion of talent. That means new coaches and players. We also need a crafty, brainey “Parcells” type in the front office to make some sane draft choices so we don’t again waste the high picks we’ve rightly earned. I also shudder to think of Marc Bulger “mentoring” our new QB. If anyone on the team represents total failure the last 3 years, it’s Bulger and his $65M contract. And, this year there’s nobody left to throw too. Even Dane Looker’s not seeming as bad anymore. I also think Chris Long IS a big problem. The odds of Little, Hall and Carriker coming back, or being effective if they do, are slim. So Long represents the keystone of our semi-pro calibre D-Line. And, Shurmur and Flajole gotta be dumped sooner rather than later.

by edpjr on Oct 26, 2009 10:56 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

the big money approach doesn't always work

look at the Redskins. I think it’s going to take years of good drafting to overcome the years of bad drafting, with the right free agents sprinkled into the mix

Turf Show Times

by VanRam on Oct 26, 2009 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

this isn’t baseball, and we’re not the yankees. it’s going to take good drafting and good free agent signings to turn this thing around. i’m not talking about big money free agents either, just the right ones to fill in the gaps.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 26, 2009 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Free agency

It is a little hard to attract players to a team like St. Louis. It’s not exactly the most attractive city for a NFL player (no offense to anyone who lives in St. Louis), and not a lot of players would want to play for the Rams.

Remember when Rex Ryan was supposedly a candidate for our HC job? And a few weeks ago on the PD website everyone was complaining that we should have gotten Rex instead of Spags. I wonder if they realized that maybe Rex didn’t want to coach the Rams.

by jb22 on Oct 26, 2009 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not saying

that actually happened. I’m just saying its a possibility that Rex just did not want to coach the Rams. People were making it seem like Rex and Spags were both DYING to get the HC job and the Rams chose Spags over Rex. We will never know how serious of a candidate Rex Ryan was, even if Devaney did fly to have a meeting with Rex.

by jb22 on Oct 26, 2009 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

while that may be true

i don’t think you can say that free agents simply won’t want to play for the rams. i’m sure there are some that are, but if you give them enough money, they will come to town.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 26, 2009 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats right

        Atleast 4 successful years starting hopefully with 2010.

by dbcouver on Oct 26, 2009 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Raiders too

Lived in LA during the Rams and Raiders days. Now based in NorCal, I am still a die hard Rams fan and Raiders season ticket holder.

by CoachConnors on Oct 26, 2009 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was a reply to Van's Big Money post above

Lived in LA during the Rams and Raiders days. Now based in NorCal, I am still a die hard Rams fan and Raiders season ticket holder.

by CoachConnors on Oct 26, 2009 6:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Devaney

was hired to be the “Parcells” type in the front office and make shrewd pickups and drafts. We’ve had one draft. He’s made a few good pickups; but we won’t know for at least another year how the process is going. If you consider that most of our draft picks from the past few years aren’t playing now, and that any good free agent signings we had didn’t really work out (Witherspoon at MLB, Glover at DT, Fakhir Brown at CB, McMichael at TE, Bell at G), it is going to take more time to reshape the roster and coach up the younger players with no real mentors on the team to bring the younger players along from their perspective.

I am the eternal optimist, but even I won’t say we can be 9-7 this year still. That would be ridiculous for how things have played out. All I’ll say is that hopefully we’ll feel a little better about all this halfway through next season.

THIS year's the year. I hope....

by thisguy on Oct 26, 2009 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

One of your DT's i read said after the game..

.. “My hat’s off to them” “Don’t be surprised if they compete in the Super bowl”… they are playing great . especially the defense compared to some of our other good teams that we’ve had

by ColtKing on Oct 27, 2009 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

2010 Draft

Assuming the Rams end up with the #1 overall pick in the 2010 draft, who do you think would be the most valuable option as of now? Suh is looking like a man beast at DT but it’s hard for me to consider anything other than a QB. Locker doesn’t impress me much and neither does Bradford or Claussen. Any opinions?

by adam2588 on Oct 26, 2009 12:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

A QB may be our #1 need, but I don’t know that I’m comfortable with the Rams selecting any of these QB’s with what will probably be the # 1 overall pick. Bardford does seem to be the leading choice, but i do question his ability to make NFL throws (i.e. anything that isn’t a 7 yard slant) and his arm strength. By question, I’m not saying he doesn’t have it. I am just slightly concerned if it will translate over to the NFL. Also, I hope his shoulder isn’t going to a be a problem in his future.

But then again, with our offensive system, we don’t need a Peyton Manning or a Drew Brees under center. We dont have a lot of vertical routes in our playbook. We just need a guy who can think quickly, and get the ball out to a WR 5-7 yards out.

by jb22 on Oct 26, 2009 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Same needs week after week

D-Line, QB, #1 Receiver, Play Calling (which could be limited due to personnel however, 3k is right.. Gado? Where’s Fells?)

You have to believe the Spoon release was cap room intended. I think with a stronger D-Line you can have a relatively weaker linebacker corp, but with the play of Lauranitis, I think Larry Grant and others can do an acceptable job if we… had D-Line Pressure!

Goodbye McMichael… you can make some really sweet plays at times but you drop too many passes, and you’re on the decline.

Burton… just not picking up things like we’d hoped.

Jackson… I don’t need to say anything here we don’t already know. 134 yards in a loss has to be sickening.

Bulger – backup at best right now, but with a stronger receiving corp I think he would be better… but great players accelerate the play of others around them… and currently Jackson is the only one elevating his game on Offense… and I don’t think it’s because of Bulger’s presence and leadership… I like Bulger… but he’ll never be what we need.

"The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall." - Vince Lombardi

by VTramsFan on Oct 26, 2009 2:00 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Burton

I’ve always been a big fan of the guy. Don’t know why. I just never really believed that he was given the chance to succeed. He’s always been randomly inserted into the lineup, and it’s hard to develop that way. I do understand that the reason he hasn’t been playing a lot is because he isn’t very talented, but I have a hard time believing that Tim Carter is more talented than K. Burton? In my opinion, he’s our #2 as of now behind Avery.

by jb22 on Oct 26, 2009 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

MOST DISAPOINTING

I DONT THINK SO MUCH THAT THE PLAYERS HAVE BEEN BAD I THINK THE COACHING THAT THEY R GETTING SUCKS THE COACHING HAS BEEN EMBARRASING WE NEED A COACH WHO KNOWS HOW TO COACH SPAGNOLA U NEED TO GO PARTNER

by ANTHONY46 on Oct 26, 2009 3:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

can't wait till next year

         We need to consider some available QBs via waiver or practice squads now because drafting one won’t fix the problem long term and I don’t think we have any QB worth keeping. If we pick one or two up halfway through the year, it will give them time to kind of learn the system so Bulger doesn’t have to be paid to coach.

by dbcouver on Oct 26, 2009 4:10 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

why do people say that Bulger needs to mentor our new QB, I say keep his ass away from any young talent we bring in before he curses them with the same jinx that got him… not every rookie needs schooling hell look at Sanchez,he looks better then anything we have same with the kid in atlanta and possibly the kid in Detroit

by peteyweestro on Oct 26, 2009 10:45 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Misleading rushing stats

The concept that you get a better picture of a running game by eliminating the “long” runs is bogus. The threat of breaking off a long run is what makes a running game. Of course, if you had a runner who would generate 4 yards EVERY carry you wouldn’t need any other offensive efforts. But that doesn’t happen. Shorter runs, incomplete passes and penalties demand longer plays or you will never drive the ball 80 yards.

If you eliminate only the single longest run by Adrian Peterson in each game this year his average drops from 5.0 to 3.5 ypg. I’m sure that eliminating AP’s 3 longest runs in each game would drop him down to at least something similar to the Colts’ 3.1 last Sunday.

A better way of measuring a running game is to see how it performs when the game is in doubt. Last Sunday, I believe Jackson had less than 40 yards at half. I’m sure the Colts were just happy as horses in slop that St Louis chose to run the ball in the second half after falling behind by 20 points.

Besides, every running play you have is one less time that your one-of-the-all-time-greats-at-quarterback doesn’t have the ball in his hands. I suspect that Colt fans would still experience that little flicker of disappointment every time Peyton handed the ball off even if JIm Brown or Barry Sanders was back there.

by coltfan59 on Oct 27, 2009 10:06 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Absofreakinglutely

Jacksons runs were in rubbish time where they had given up the game and the colts were willing to let them run.

The colt runs on the other hand were in time where we wanted to run out the clock and the Rams knew that, so the averages really are misleading.

by ColtsUK on Oct 27, 2009 8:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.
Start posting about the Rams »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
NFL Draft Prospects: QB

Recent FanPosts

Small
Now how about O Line?
Small
Are you sick of Quarterback / Defensive Tackle talk?
Marshall_small
The QB/DT article ratio is getting out of hand...
Images_small
NFL superbowl "Thank You" commercial
6373_1178781999057_1513353765_478885_4528660_s_small
Enough of the Superbowl talk...
Peter_small
"For Pete's Sake!" Super-Sunday Edition
Lombardi_small
The harsh reality of a life without the CBA
Keywork_small
Billy Devany (Rams GM) Interview
Images_small
"Here's to the future!"

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Acme Packing Company
Replay: Tracy Porter's Super Bowl INT Return
Mocking The Draft
Morgan Burnett NFL Draft scouting report
The Phinsider
A quick look at free agent tight ends

Cover the web with Turf

Add a little Turf to your internet!

Become a fan of TST on Facebook.

Follow TST and talk more Rams on Twitter.


Managers

Turfshowtimes_small VanRam

Editors

Spags_victory_small 3k

Authors

340x_small kevinramsfan

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Uncleface_small taiko

79de1760b8532ce8_small ram_rod

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors