Turf Show Times: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

What We Have/Need (Revised for Trade)


         There has been a lot of talk lately about the next offseason for the Rams.  Well I'm going to do that too, bu that's not all.  I thought it would be nice to look at what the Rams do have and then we can build off of that.  I categorized everyone on the team into the following categories:  Players to build around, Players that need to go/aren't NFL quality, players too unproven to truly categorize, players that make the cut/players for the future, and of course, players on the bubble.  There are a couple that may not be agreed upon by everyone, but I think the players we need to build around are pretty much universally acceptable, with maybe the exception of one, but we'll see.  So here I go.

Star-divide

Players to Keep and Build around
---------------------------------

OFFENSE
WR Avery-- we can build around him with a big tall athletic receiver, Fitzgerald/Bryant type.
HB Jackson
FB Karney
LT Smith
C Brown
RG Incognito-- no matter how hated he has been, when he is under control, he is a pretty good guard

DEFENSE
OLB Witherspoon--getting older but still good enough to build around for the next few years.
MLB Lauranitus
CB Bartell
SS Butler
FS Atogwe

Special Teams
P Jones-- after today, I'm not so sure, but I'm assuming it was a fluke
K Brown

------------------------------------------------

Players that Need to Go/Aren't NFL Quality

------------------------------------------------
OFFENSE
QB Boller
HB Gado
HB Darby
WR Carter
C Setterstrom

DEFENSE
OLB Lenon
DT Carriker
CB Butler
FS Roach

-------------------------------------------------

Players that haven't shown enough to tell
(Maybe means not good enough to be in NFL)

-------------------------------------------------

OFFENSE
QB Null
OG Allen III
WR Foster
WR Jones

OT Trautwein
WR Martin-- if he ever plays he could be big for us-- we'll see

WR Gibson-- Have no Idea about this guy yet, I guess we'll see.

DEFENSE
DE Ah You (has been solid but still unproven)
DT Douzable
DT Scott
LB Douglas
S Smith
DT Ramsey
LB Grant

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Players who make the cut/ not centerpieces/ average young players
(will be on the roster next year)

-------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFENSE
WR Burton
WR Robinson
WR Amendola
OL Greco
TE Fells
TE Bajema

DEFENSE
DT Ryan
S Dahl
CB Fletcher

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Players on the bubble/ depends on draft picks and signings

------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFENSE
QB Bulger (if we don't draft a QB first round, he'll likely stay)
OT Barron
LG Bell
OL Goldberg
TE McMichael

DEFENSE
DE Little
DE Long
DE Adeyanju
DT Gibson-- has played well but if we get a big DT, who knows
CB King
CB Wade

OLB Vobora

SPECIAL TEAMS
LS Massey

------------------------------------

Free agents to be at season's end

-------------------------------------

QB Boller
TE McMichael
OG Incognito
OT Barron
DE Adeyanju
DE Little
DT Ryan
CB Wade

 

Needs:  Big #1 Receiver, DT, DE, CB, Decent Backup HB for SJax, O-line, TE, OLB and of course, QB

While the needs cover every position on the field besides safety and kickers, we still could improve greatly next year by filling 2 or 3 of the big ones (DT, WR, QB).   Hopefully we can get a good, immediate impact second rounder again, like Lauranitus, since it is basically a late first round pick we will have. 

For TE, Scheffler and Daniels are both FA's, if either one of them doesn't get resigned, I'd suck them up pretty quickly.  Also Fasano.  Hopefully we can get one of them or find one in the mid-late rounds of the draft.  Maybe Pitta in the third

For WR, free agency may not be an option anymore.  Earlier in this year it looked like two big receivers would be available, but things have changed ever so much.  Marshall will probably stay in Denver now and Edwards is now with the Jets and may want to stay there.  Vincent Jackson will most likely be resigned by the Chargers.  As for the draft, Bryant is an option if we choose that route, which I doubt we will, so we have to look later.  A couple big guys, Danario Alexander, Eric Decker, and Dezmon Briscoe, could all be good gets.  I also like Bryan Anderson from Central Michigan in the later rounds, maybe to go with Lefevour??  6-5 4.6 40 could go 6th round or later, maybe even undrafted.

For DT/DE, I think this is where we most likely go early in the draft if not for QB.  Suh or Dunlap.  Either one of these guys should still be on the board at number 1 overall.  Both guys are beasts and would greatly improve our line.  I'm leaning towards Suh.  As for the FAs, not much there. Dumervil won't be a FA I'd think.  Peppers is the most likely FA.  But he'll be 30.  Vance Wilfork at DT, likely to be resigned, so really not much there at all.

For OLB, don't see us drafting anyone, probably someone we already have or a FA.  Lots of talent there FA-wise, but most of it will be resigned (Ware, Merriman, etc.)  Perhaps the Chiefs, Derrick Johnson since the talks about him recently.

For HB, I think if we're going to get a real good backup/change of pace for SJax it will have to be a steal late in the draft, because first of all, I don't see us spending a high draft pick on a HB, and second of all, what good HB would want to sign with us?  Jackson believes in and is capable of playing 90+% of the time.  And who would want to be in that situation.  But if I had to pick a FA for us, it would be Jerius Norwood.

For O-line, there are too many possible scenarios to even go into, with the possible release or free agency of Bell, Barron, and Incognito.

For CB, theres some talent to be had, if it goes unsigned.  Dunta Robinson got the franchise tag from the Texans this year, and I don't think he was too happy about it, maybe he'll be a FA.  The loud mouth Carlos Rodgers is a FA too.  Other names are Ellis Hobbs, Marlin Jackson, Leigh Bodden, Roderick Hood, Richard Marshall, Karl Paymah, Fabian Washington and Terrence McGee.  Joe Haden could go second round.  He is projected to be the best CB and a first rounder in the 2011 draft, but this year he is projected as a second rounder.  If he falls, I wouldn't mind taking him.

And last but definitely not least, QB.  We are likely going to replace Bulger next year, whether it be with Null, or someone that is not yet a Ram (most likely).  Potential FA's- Campbell, Orton, Pennington and Tavaris Jackson.  Out of those guys I'd take any of the three not named Pennington.  But that is most likely a moot point because the Rams will not go after a FA QB unless necessary.  If we go first round, Colt McCoy, Sam Bradford, Jake Locker, and Jimmy Clausen are the most likely options.  I'd prefer one of the last two.  But if we don't go first round, which is about a 50-50 shot we don't, I say we go for Dan Lefevour, in the 2nd or 3rd round.  My hopes would be to get him in the third if we could, but we can't miss on him if we pass on the FA's and the first rounder.  I would love to have him, maybe, MAYBE, he could even develop a season under Bulger, since he wouldn't be making big first round QB money.

 

So with all that said, here are the players I'd like to get out of the draft:

Rd. 1- DT Suh

Rd. 2- CB Haden

Rd. 3- QB Lefevour

Other players I'd like to get:

WRs Bryan Anderson and/or Danario Alexander

It's hard to predict late rounds and it is getting pretty late, but those are 4 or 5 players I would love to get out of the 2010 draft.

THE END

I think we need to get at least 4 starters out of this draft.  9 draft picks, the first 3 rounds should all be good enough to be starters, and hopefully we could hit with a 4th or one of our two 5th rounders.

I <3 LeFevour

Poll
What postion should we spend our first rounder on assuming we're drafting for need and not for best available talent and also assuming that everyone's available (which is very likely)?
QB
35 votes
WR
20 votes
DE/DT
29 votes
CB
0 votes
Other
2 votes
Who cares, as long as we get LeFevour
5 votes

91 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 57 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

i don't know how much you watch mizzou

but if you’re looking for a big #1 type receiver, i don’t think danario is what you’re looking for. he may be a good 3/4 type in the nfl, but he’s not a #1.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 19, 2009 12:47 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I know those guys aren't # 1 receivers

but if we don’t get a #1 early we still need a big tall receiver and he’s 6’5’’ and a 45" vertical leap, so he’d be good to have in the red zone. If we had a guy like him in the red zone today we could have gone for it at the end of the game and just thrown the ball up near him and if he comes down with it we win, if he doesn’t we lose. If you throw the ball around 10 feet in the air most corners aren’t going to intercept that.
But I am Mizzou biased

Reserved-- been waiting 6 weeks to have this sig, I guess I can wait 1 more

by Carneros on Oct 19, 2009 12:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

as am i

alexander is a big dude with good hands and good speed. he’ll be a good player for somebody.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 19, 2009 12:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not a bad analysis, but...

…I think you have to count Bulger, Little, Hall, Barron, Bell and probably Incognito as goners. Bulger is too beat up and expensive. Little and Hall are just getting too old. Barron, Bell and Incognito just don’t have a consistent winning football mentality.

As far as the draft goes, we have glaring needs everywhere, so we should just TAKE THE BEST AVAILABLE PLAYERS.

And if we could scare up a credible OC, that would help alot too.

by edpjr on Oct 19, 2009 1:06 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

But my guess is that we won't really do that

Especially if we’re going to go the QB route. Incognito is a good guard and Spags may have fixed him. He’s better than Bell. I didn’t put those guys as the ones that need to go because we can’t get rid of all of them unless we draft/sign a QB, a DE, an OT, and an OG, and with the other moves we have to make this offseason, I don’t see us finding replacements for all of those guys. I say all but one leave, but it just depends.

Reserved-- been waiting 6 weeks to have this sig, I guess I can wait 1 more

by Carneros on Oct 19, 2009 7:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't we have

Bulger under a contract that will pay him even if we cut him?? Incognito has been playing good, thinking the coach’s conversation w/him helped so he might not go.

Suh in the first. The guy does it all; blocks pass attempts, intercepts, catches td’s, makes tackles…

by RamsFan1979 on Oct 19, 2009 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

God I hope not.

Contracts in the NFL are NOT guaranteed (like they are in the MLB) but if there’s some clause in his contract that guarantees the whole thing, I’b be astounded and would not be at all upset if edpjr and james paid Mr. Zygmunt a little visit………i kid….i kid…….sortof…..

Either way, his money would come off the salary cap (if there is one next year) so that would be a positive.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 19, 2009 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

bulger will be on the team next year

i’m confident that the rams will do the right thing and draft a QB with the top pick next year, but bulger will still be the starter next year with the kid backing him up while learning the system under bulger. null will be brought back to play third string again and boller will not be resigned.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 19, 2009 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you might be right

If Kyle Boller had proven anything, he’d probably be back as the starter while the new QB was grown. But I just don’t see them putting themselves in the position of having only Keith Null as the only QB on the roster who knows the system.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 19, 2009 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bradford could drop to 2nd round.

I heard on ESPN one analyst say that Bradford could drop to second round. If we take Suh in the first round and Bradford in the second that would be a good draft day.

Football players, like prostitutes, are in the business of ruining their bodies for the pleasure of strangers. ~Merle Kessler

by mlkgandhiv2k on Oct 19, 2009 1:48 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He won't drop that far

        At this point I think I’d rather have Locker

by dbcouver on Oct 19, 2009 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree about Bradford.

He’ll never drop that far. Someone’s gonna take a shot on him late in the first if he lasts that long.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 19, 2009 6:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't tease me!!!

You are a sick twisted man to even make me think that would be possible!!!

by Brendan W on Oct 24, 2009 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah that would be pretty nice

I do like bradford dont get me wrong im just not sold on him being a first round pick yet. Carlos dunlap isn’t a bad player either hes a hell of a pass rusher and freak athlete but does seem to give up on some plays. Suh seems pretty good but nebraska linemen dont seem to work out for us (carriker) but i would like to see dunlap even play linebacker hes got the speed to be and at 300 lbs would be hard to block him. But i see him in a 3-4 defense he’d be a good fit. I really dont know where to begin with this teams problems so i guess getting the best skilled player in every round seems to be the only logical thing to do since all of are positions are pretty weak.

by keeperskillz24 on Oct 19, 2009 4:04 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Other than Carriker the only other Nebraska lineman in recent memory was Wistrom

I don’t think that warrants a bad history when 1 out of 2 are busts

Reserved-- been waiting 6 weeks to have this sig, I guess I can wait 1 more

by Carneros on Oct 19, 2009 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Suh looks like a real monster.

Not only is he hard to block on runs, but he gets lots of push up the middle on pass plays, something we just don’t have.

by andyrose on Oct 19, 2009 5:21 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Steven Jackson

        should be available for draft picks if the offer was good enough. He’s our best value right now and he’ll never be worth more. The pats aren’t likely to go that route but with Taylor out they might be worth talking to. I know it’s unpopular here and I can’t avoid that. It’s just that I believe any success we have in the future will be far enough to occur outside of his prime, making a trade for picks the best possible scenario. I like Jackson, especially for his alma mater but if the price was right I wouldn’t be disappointed.

by dbcouver on Oct 19, 2009 6:13 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I'm not sure what you're looking for in a return for Jackson.

But keep in mind, Marshall Faulk was traded to the Rams for a 2nd round and 5th round pick.

If that’s a good enough haul, the okay, but if you’re looking for another 1st rounder…well, those are tougher to come by straight up without flipping draft positions.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 19, 2009 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It would be moot

        if we didn’t get 2 firsts (one next year) and a second, or more. I know thats not likely but if it could happen I would take it. I do like Jackson, so I wouldn’t go for much less, if at all. Another rule for me would be to replace him with one of those picks or in free agency. We can’t afford to do anything without surely getting 1 or 2 fillins. If we don’t do as poorly in the last few drafts as we have I’d keep Jax also. We just gotta maximize draft picks until we can get it right 2-3 times in a row.

by dbcouver on Oct 19, 2009 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you're hitting on something here.

The biggest problem in trading Jackson is, that would just create another major hole. Unfortunately we don’t have someone able to just step in.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 19, 2009 8:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats right

        Thus my rule

by dbcouver on Oct 20, 2009 5:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you Jeff Gordon?

I just read Gordo’s column today and he makes the same statement that the Rams are in no position to trade Jax until they can prove they can kick ass (my words) in the draft every year.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 20, 2009 7:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe for 2 second rounders and a first rounder next year.

If we could get that I would take it pretty quickly, but less than that I"m not sure. He’s could be great for at least another 5 years and I believe we can have a good team by then.

Reserved-- been waiting 6 weeks to have this sig, I guess I can wait 1 more

by Carneros on Oct 19, 2009 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

no way a team gives up three picks in the first two rounds for him

if you’re thinking that could actually happen, you’re simply thinking unrealistically.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 19, 2009 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

that or something close to that is the only deal I'd take.

If a team is willing to give that up then I’ll take it, if they don’t, I’m fine with keeping arguably the best and most complete RB in the league.

Reserved-- been waiting 6 weeks to have this sig, I guess I can wait 1 more

by Carneros on Oct 19, 2009 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i just wish

he could pass block

by jb22 on Oct 21, 2009 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

unlikely yes

 unrealistic, no. But I would expect nothing less. I will always explore outside the box possibilities, and you will always consider them unrealstic. Spare me the intelligent insight,, You’d be surprised how few of my speculations I think are ACTUALLY going to happen.

by dbcouver on Oct 19, 2009 7:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

then honestly

why even post them? if you think it’s unrealistic and not going to happen, what’s the point in even speculating that in some crazy situation, it could happen?

i agree with both of you however that the rams would have to get back a lot. in my opinion it would take a first rounder and a third rounder to get it done, but i doubt any team will be willing to offer that.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 19, 2009 7:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with dbcouver

in that if offered a 1st and 2 2nds, I’d take that deal in a heartbeat. But, I also agree with ‘fang in that I don’t think any team would offer that.

If Marshall Faulk didn’t require a 1st rounder, then I see it highly unlikely that Jackson would. Although, (and don’t puke when you read this, just put yourselves in their shoes) wouldn’t Steven Jackson look really good in that New England backfield? They would be unstoppable.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 19, 2009 8:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

my keyboard is all messy now thanks to you

they can have jackson for 2010 and 2011 first rounders, randy moss, and wes welker. nothing short of that. ;)

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 19, 2009 8:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

awww...you're just bitter.....

but that would be a hell of a haul!

And we’ll throw in Danny Amendola since we’d be getting the real thing in Welker, right?

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 19, 2009 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He would, but no

Jackson would look good on a lot of teams, Saints, Vikes, 49ers, and yes Patriots but New England spreads the ball around too much to even want a back like Jackson. If you can throw down 50 points with a Maroney, why would you spend so much in one place on a Jackson? Although they did surprise me when they last went after a name brand RB in Corey Dillon, I don’t see them investing that much in one back when they really have no need to.

Lived in LA during the Rams and Raiders days. Now based in NorCal, I am still a die hard Rams fan and Raiders season ticket holder.

by CoachConnors on Oct 19, 2009 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's true.

Although it was all a little silly anyway…..

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 19, 2009 9:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now that I think about it...

let silliness live!

Almost ALL the teams Jackson would look good on are successful enough already that they don’t need him. The Broncos used to feature a big back and they’re undefeated now without one (and without Shanahan). Saints score a bazillion points with their current personnel, Patriots too, Giants apparently can’t make good use of Brandon Jacobs…would really hate to see Jax go to a division rival, but that’s not going to happen anyway….

Who would trade good picks for a RB right now? Thats tough. Like I said, I think RB’s easier to come by, compared to what most fans would want for a perceived centerpiece like Jackson.

Lived in LA during the Rams and Raiders days. Now based in NorCal, I am still a die hard Rams fan and Raiders season ticket holder.

by CoachConnors on Oct 19, 2009 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I nearly

spit my coffee all over the screen. I’m still bitter about SB XXXVI.

THIS year's the year. I hope....

by thisguy on Oct 21, 2009 8:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yep

I’d take it immediately.
Because it’s too good to be true.

Lived in LA during the Rams and Raiders days. Now based in NorCal, I am still a die hard Rams fan and Raiders season ticket holder.

by CoachConnors on Oct 19, 2009 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Da'Rel Scott.

Da’Rel Scott out of Maryland is another guy I’d like to see the Rams get. He is a HB at 5’11 190 lbs with a 4.25 40 yard time. He could fall to into the 5th round if he enters the draft this year. He would be great in combination with SJax.

Reserved-- been waiting 6 weeks to have this sig, I guess I can wait 1 more

by Carneros on Oct 19, 2009 7:04 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Gado

Is no SJax, but he can play in this league. That’s not an endorsement to build around him as a feature. Just that he can play at a respectable level in all three phases: running, catching and blocking.

Count me among those that would trade Jackson for the right price for a couple of reasons: 1) his value is high right now that he is staying healthy, 2) he’s running extremely strong this year, and 3) I think good RB’s are not that hard to find. They’re easier to find than elite QB’s.

We’re already going to have a very high pick because of our sterling record, so if we get another 1 or 2 (plus a lower round) then fine. Its pretty rare to see big name players exchanged, so getting picks in return would seem more likely, to me anyway.

I think there will be no slary cap next year. I would invest heavily in the OG’s, DT’s and QB.

Lived in LA during the Rams and Raiders days. Now based in NorCal, I am still a die hard Rams fan and Raiders season ticket holder.

by CoachConnors on Oct 19, 2009 9:03 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Gado

I just don’t think he can be the feature back. He couldn’t stick in GB where they needed a RB for a long time. But, you are right, it is easier to find RBs. Speaking of Green Bay, isn’t Ryan Grant basically a scrap heap find?

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 19, 2009 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gado isn't a feature - but do we need a feature?

Lets say we get O line upgrades in exchange or through picks…or a QB…do we need a feature back, will we need a feature back when the other parts come together?

Its tough without knowing what we’d have without him, presumably something in return even if it’s rookies from picks, but how many teams are rolling right along with committees? Most. I think Gado could definitely fit in a committee.

Lived in LA during the Rams and Raiders days. Now based in NorCal, I am still a die hard Rams fan and Raiders season ticket holder.

by CoachConnors on Oct 19, 2009 10:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you talking about trading Jackson tomorrow?

(that’s the deadline).

If so, who else do you have on the roster other than Gado can reliably carry the rock? It’d be him and Darby. Call Gado the feature or whatever….split the carries. Either way, that’s not a good option.

I don’t even think Gado is good enough to be a decent part of a RB by committee.

Unless you’re talking about trading Jackson in the offseason (although I think you’d get better value mid-season for him). In that case, you could make necessary adjustments.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 19, 2009 10:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No - just before next year starts

This year is done and decided as far as that goes

Lived in LA during the Rams and Raiders days. Now based in NorCal, I am still a die hard Rams fan and Raiders season ticket holder.

by CoachConnors on Oct 19, 2009 10:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gado was decent for Houston

He has good hands. We didn’t see much of him this preseason but don;t forget all our RBs looked like hell in the new coach’s new system

Lived in LA during the Rams and Raiders days. Now based in NorCal, I am still a die hard Rams fan and Raiders season ticket holder.

by CoachConnors on Oct 19, 2009 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is what I thought too

        A feature RB is a luxury we can’t afford to hold onto if we can multiply the talent he may bring. NE would easily have the most to offer but thats exactly why they won’t. They don’t trade picks they accumulate them. But with Taylor out and the rest of the conference having closed the gap between themselves and the patriots, who knows? It never hurts to ask.
         We need an O-line thats good enough to open holes for any decent back. Without that, Jackson won’t have success and neither will we. If this keeps up he may demand a trade anyway, thereby nullifying the maximum return we may have gotten.

by dbcouver on Oct 20, 2009 5:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Waterfootball.com

was LeFevour going into the 6-7 round. So if we don’t get Locker we can get him in the same round as Keith Null.

Reserved-- been waiting 6 weeks to have this sig, I guess I can wait 1 more

by Carneros on Oct 19, 2009 10:10 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

has*

Reserved-- been waiting 6 weeks to have this sig, I guess I can wait 1 more

by Carneros on Oct 19, 2009 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Walterfootball.com

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 19, 2009 10:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well if Walter says it, then count it!

Who the hell is

Lived in LA during the Rams and Raiders days. Now based in NorCal, I am still a die hard Rams fan and Raiders season ticket holder.

by CoachConnors on Oct 19, 2009 10:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

idk

there always the first result for mock drafts on google so they must be good

Reserved-- been waiting 6 weeks to have this sig, I guess I can wait 1 more

by Carneros on Oct 19, 2009 10:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

theyre *

I keep missing letters

Reserved-- been waiting 6 weeks to have this sig, I guess I can wait 1 more

by Carneros on Oct 19, 2009 10:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

idk either

but it’s a pretty cool site.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Oct 19, 2009 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Love Walter's homage to Emmitt Smith

Emmitt had the most appalling lack of grammatical command I have ever seen on a network channel. Ever. It’s not even that I can laugh at him, it was so bad. He will forever epitomize my vision of the dumb jock.

Lived in LA during the Rams and Raiders days. Now based in NorCal, I am still a die hard Rams fan and Raiders season ticket holder.

by CoachConnors on Oct 19, 2009 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Walters

        opinions aren’t relevant but I like the website for it’s information on college kids as well as free agency. One of many sources I refer to.

by dbcouver on Oct 20, 2009 5:38 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Dunlap

Dunlap is a very athletic DE, but I see him snooze on half the plays. Reminds me of another Florida product named Barron.

by 81 Witness on Oct 20, 2009 12:58 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

You're not alone

        This trait may drop him to the 2nd or 3rd

by dbcouver on Oct 20, 2009 3:06 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.
Start posting about the Rams »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dickcheneycftblmask2_small
Saints versus Rams - Trap Game?

Recent FanPosts

Andrew602_avatar_small
Ask Revenge of the Birds
Dickcheneycftblmask2_small
Cards versus Rams - close game or blowout?
Ncaab_uclabruins_small
The greatness that is Steven Jackson
Bruce_holt_small
Ndamukong Suh vs. Gerald McCoy
Small
O-line grades
Ricky_prohel_small
Please thank Mike Karney and the offensive line for their job this season
Peter_small
Sent SJAX An "Honorable Tweet" + Shower Loofa
Dsc03827_small
A Link to the Jim Rome Radio Show
Images
The Draft

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mobile Live
Eagles shuffle linebackers again
Mobile Live
The VRR: Redskins (3-6) @ Cowboys (6-3)
Mobile Live
Antonio Pierce out indefinitely

Cover the web with Turf

Add a little Turf to your internet!

Become a fan of TST on Facebook.

Follow TST and talk more Rams on Twitter.


Managers

Turfshowtimes_small VanRam

Editors

Spags_victory_small 3k

Authors

340x_small kevinramsfan

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Uncleface_small taiko

Small ram_rod

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors