Turf Show Times: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Atlanta Falcons: Our Kingdom For A Pass Rush Bar-right-arrows



Is Steven Jackson unhappy with his holdout and his agent?

I haven't heard anything more specific about the report from this weekend that Steven Jackson "may be" thinking of seeking new representation. Currently, Jackson's represented by Eugene Parker, agent to stars, who represents nine players selected for the Pro Bowl last season.

Several Parker clients are involved in contract stalemates, er, holdouts, and there's some insight into Jackson's situation from another Parker client holding out. Buffalo Bills LT Jason Peters has yet to report to the Bills camp. Peters wants a new deal restructuring the final three years of his contract and has been holding out. Like the situation between Jackson and the Rams, Peters is said to be on amicable terms with his team, even though he's not directly or officially in contact. The Bills' front office won't negotiate until Peters reports to camp, a position that should sound familiar to Rams fans.

What does that have to do with Steven Jackson? According to this report from WGRZ in Buffalo, Jackson is unhappy with his situation, not just his lack of a contract, but the damage his name is potentially encountering as the holdout drags on, and he's thinking of dumping Parker as a result. Here's the quote:

There may be a tiny crack in Parker's universe, however, with word that Rams running back Steven Jackson, currently holding out even though he has a year left on his contract, is seriously thinking of firing Parker. Jackson is unhappy that he doesn't have a new extension with the Rams, but he's now beginning to apparently realize maybe he's hurting himself more than he's helping Parker.

Anecdotally, this jives with reports that Jackson has been keeping in touch with Linehan and others inside the Rams locker room. Jackson's holdout has already cost him a year of accured eligibilty toward free agency, and could threaten what might be a career year if it drags on too much longer. That's got to upset a competitor who's already seen the Rams make a good faith offer to make him among the top paid running backs in the league. (For the record, I think Jackson deserves more than Clinton Portis though and at least even with Larry Johnson's deal).

This news adds a new wrinkle to story, and I doubt that Jackson reports to camp without the okay from his manager, Parker. It's not a stretch to assume that reporting for camp is a sticking point between Jackson and his agent, as Jackson knows the Rams want to keep the centerpiece of their offense at a fair market value. However, I can't imagine Parker relenting on that until the Rams indicate their willingness to negotiate without Jackson in camp, and Parker might like his leverage better after the result of the first preseason game. Something's got to give here.

0 recs | Comment 1 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

VANRAM,

All Jackson has to do is report by the eighth week of the regular season and he fulfills the requirements of his contract. He has not lost any eligibility for free agency. If he fulfulls his contrat, he is eligible in March of 2009.

by tjcasados on Aug 14, 2008 1:21 AM CDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

10138706_small
More Bad News for the Rams
Uncleface_small
Happier Thoughts
Dave_small
Niners Nation Q&A
Turfshowtimes_small
TST Fantasy league - week 11
769189_small
Fox Sports Midseason awards
10138706_small
Bennett and Hall placed on IR
Locke_small
Most Memorable Rams Games Ever???
G_small
Got Questions for the Arizona Cardinals?
10138706_small
Rams send tape from Pats game to NFL
Turfshowtimes_small
TST Fantasy League - week 8

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Turfshowtimes_small VanRam

Editors

Donnie_avery_art_small 3k

ad

Site Meter