Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Super Bowl Recipes: A Guide To The Perfect Game Day Menu

Long over Dorsey... Not even a question.

Many have questions, but only some have answers.  Long over Dorsey??? Yes. Long over Dorsey, and all I have to say is that was a great move.  Here are my five reasons why: 1) Dorsey is not going to sign until the last week of training camp, thus limiting his production in his rookie season. 2) Dorsey had a down second half of his last season with the LSU Tigers. 3) Dorsey is overrated, and is not the next Warren Sapp. 4) Chris Long is better and more determined.  This is why Long should have been drafted over Dorsey.

 

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

good point(s)

to me, the Rams need for a DE outweighed the benefits of taking Dorsey.

by Ryan Van Bibber on May 11, 2008 11:43 AM CDT reply actions  

Five great reasons

There is no reason for me to believe that Dorsey will not be Claude Wroten 2.0, and that Chris Long will not be Howie Long 2.0. Long over Dorsey!

October 26; the countdown has begun.

by Marmie is the best on May 11, 2008 6:26 PM CDT reply actions  

Why do you care so much about Dorsey failing?

I had Dorsey over Long and was very disapointed about the selection.

Having said that, I hope I am totally wrong about Long (can’t really care about Dorsey now one way or the other).

GO LONG! Let’s see what ya got. We are all pulling for you now.

"Santa Claus brings pennants to the teams with the best chemistry"

by vladtheimpaler on May 12, 2008 2:58 AM CDT reply actions  

What?

Good reasoning for liking Dorsey or Long.

by Witherspoon 51 on May 12, 2008 11:29 AM CDT reply actions  

Long...

is a future HOFer

October 26; the countdown has begun.

by Marmie is the best on May 12, 2008 8:34 PM CDT reply actions  

True

I could not agree with you more “marmie is the best”.

by Witherspoon 51 on May 12, 2008 11:38 PM CDT reply actions  

agreed

I would much rather have a line of Little, Carriker, Ryan/Glover, and Long rather than Little, Carriker, Dorsey, Glover, Hall. We have two aging DE’s and two promising young DT’s in Ryan and Carriker. Its just common sense.

by thebigwb on May 14, 2008 3:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Over statement.

Its way too earily to start saying things like HOF for a guy who has yet to play a snap.

by PSKPSE on May 17, 2008 1:20 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images-1_small
Eye told ewe sew
Small
MY FIRST MOCK DRAFT! :D
26934064_l_small
Can the Rams' draft be successful without a trade?
Images-1_small
How about before the draft, we...
Small
Revolving Door at QB may be hurting the Rams Trade Down Options

Recent FanPosts

Small
Why We Must Draft Kalil
Small
mock draft 2.0
Rams_small
Rams Starting Roster with Free Agents and Draft Picks per Bleacher Report
Small
2012 Rams 53-Man Roster
Small
'Skins or Fins Might Work Out as Well
Small
Why is the EJD so bad?
Small
Mockdraft
Small
How's this trade

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors

Mardygilyardsig_small Tevin T. Broner

Bradford_draft_small buckeyefan55

Tst_small T.Ram

Images_small Brick Top

Small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich