To bench Bulger or not to bench Bulger...
There is more wrong with the Rams offense than just Marc Bulger. A made even more obvious on a day when the #1 running back was playing through an injury and the backups were out (Minor with a concussion) or left the game (Pittman with a hamstring). The offensive line is, to be generous, sub-par. And even the play calling, as we pointed out early in the comments, confounded, with passes to the FB and TEs, not exactly the guys that stretch the chains.
With the blame game well underway around the internet, I think most know the team lacks a central scapegoat to pin the loss on. Haslett can make some minor changes, replace a player here and there, but since the Rams biggest problem over the last few seasons has been depth fixing this has to wait at least another season.
I talked about benching Bulger after the game yesterday, and I still wonder about it. Clearly, the years have not been kind and he's not playing at a level consistent with what he is capable of or for one of the league's highest paid QBs. Yes, the line is not adequate enough to protect him, even with Orlando Pace playing. And without a running game, opposing defenses have only Bulger to worry about. However, benching him carries consequences.
First and foremost, it probably heralds the end of Bulger's days as a Ram. In his mind, benching him now places blame for the team's problems on him. When that happened earlier in the season, Bulger said he would never play for Linehan again, and it's safe to assume the same would be true of Haslett. The Rams could then trade him or release him, which would give them much needed draft picks or money to spend. Like Warner, I think Bulger's seasons as a tackle dummy behind a poor Rams line has caught up to him. Now he needs time regain form and confidence.
Second, benching Bulger won't end the Rams offensive problems. The line still can't block very well. Now, as far as the run game goes, Jackson will get better, but the line has and will continue to limit what he can do too. I suggested yesterday the possibility of bringing back Romberg at C or sliding Incognito over and letting Greco work at RG. That still doesn't solve the problem in total, but you do wonder if it might at least make it a little better. In truth, if the Rams do bench Bulger they might be better off with Berlin at QB since he has some scrambling ability.
There's no easy route here, just patience. And the media-hyped Warner/Bulger controversy only fans the flames to no productive end. There's plenty of cause to debate whether or not replacing Bulger merits consideration though. But understand that decision carries long-term implications.
0 recs |
4 comments
|
Comments
Don't Bench...
I mentioned in a previous post that I am not a fan of Bulger and hope to trade/release him depending on if a QB is drafted in the 09 draft – but I don’t think you bench him. As you mentioned, he is not the only issue and the OL doesn’t get any better regardless of who is at QB. Green or Berlin represent neiter an upgrade nor the future of the QB position for the Rams (IMO) so there is no reason to remove Bulger this year. If a QB is highly drafted in 09 – then you make a decision to keep them as back up for a yr (keep Bulger as starter) or start them right away (trading/releasing Bulger).
The only other thing to your point – is that there are more issues then QB. So IF other needs (OL, Secondary) are addressed in the 09 draft over QB – then you might as well keep Bulger over any FA because of A) money and B) its a multiyear rebuilding project anyway. Then IMO – you draft QB in ’10 and you start them right away.
So the short answer to my long explaination – Keep him as the starter for now, but no scenario that I would be happy with keeps him past the 09 season.
Outfielders For Sale! This weeks special...GMJ - see Tony for details!
by gorams77 on Nov 3, 2008 11:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I voted "no"
But the burden is on him to improve his play. If he can’t admit that his play has stunk, then he has no business in the leadership position of the offense.
Open question: if the Cardinals decide they’re going back to Leinert after this season, would you pay for two years of Kurt Warner for 09-10 to replace Bulger?
"Attaway to stomp 'em. Stomp the piss out of 'em. Stomp 'em when they're down. Kick 'em and stomp 'em. Attaway to go boys. Pound that old Budweiser into you and go get them tomorrow." -- Joe Schultz
by taiko on Nov 3, 2008 11:30 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Put Warner behing this line and you're no better than you are right now.
Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.
by Tackle Box on Nov 3, 2008 9:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I say not this week but !
He has sucked, no question on that, not even close to his older days, this is the problem with Bulger, yes we know his taken hits, but if he will not stand in the pocket and take some hits to make completions then he should be taken out of the line up, if this guy needs to have only perfect conditions to preform take him out cause thats not gona happen any time soon , our chances are much better with any one else taking his place, Bunger has gone chicken, even when he has protection from the line he gets scared and runs out of the safty of the pocket just to run into the presure from the defence , seems hes realy lost all his will to win, personaly i know his done , he will never be the same as a few years ago when he replaced Warner, and that was the bigest mistake the Rams ever made to get rid of Warner , as you can all see now, i said if from day one
how you let go a two time NFL MVP , and the only QB that has won a superbowl for this team , that move showd me that the Rams front office was in shambles, and the team on the way down, but back to the point Bulgers replasment is definatly sooner then later
seems every time we pay the money to some one and they get a nice big fat signing bonus every thing changes , from now on contract closess you get paid if you preform only or else you be on wellfaifr the minimum pay ta hell with this system, bonusess for preformance and pay cuts for below average play, end of story
by james535 on Nov 3, 2008 3:24 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 


















